Evaluation of a Nurse-Led Group-Based Education Programme for In-Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Göransson, Carina; Kirkegaard, Asbjörn; Fridlund, Bengt

doi:10.1177/010740830302300307

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The intervention duration varied among studies: from 15 minutes 21 to more than 80 hours 32 (mean, 9.5 hours; median, 7.25 hours) ( Table 2). In addition, follow-up length ranged from 6 weeks 48 to 2 years 44,50 (mean, 10 months; median, 12 months) ( Table 2). Ten studies § excluded patients with significant cardiac disease (congestive heart failure and/or ischemic heart disease).…”

Section: Types Of Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Review of the Chronic Care Model in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Prevention and Management

Adams¹,

Smith²,

Allan³

et al. 2007

Arch Intern Med

320

279

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Implementation of the chronic care model (CCM) has been shown to be an effective preventative strategy to improve outcomes in diabetes mellitus, depression, and congestive heart failure, but data are lacking regarding the effectiveness of this model in preventing complications in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases from inception to August 2005 and included English-language articles that enrolled adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and (1) contained intervention(s) with CCM component(s), (2) included a comparison group or measures at 2 points (before/after), and (3) had relevant outcomes. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Results: Symptoms, quality of life, lung function, and functional status were not significantly different between the intervention and control groups. However, pooled relative risks (95% confidence intervals

show abstract

Section: Types Of Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%