2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a portable chlorophyll meter to estimate chlorophyll and nitrogen contents in sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
41
2
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
41
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant positive correlation observed between leaf N concentrations and chlorophyll index in northern red oak (Fig. 4) concurs with results of other studies with hardwoods [6,56]. In the present study, CI could explain 72% of the variation in red oak leaf N concentrations.…”
Section: Leaf Physiology and Nutritional Responsessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significant positive correlation observed between leaf N concentrations and chlorophyll index in northern red oak (Fig. 4) concurs with results of other studies with hardwoods [6,56]. In the present study, CI could explain 72% of the variation in red oak leaf N concentrations.…”
Section: Leaf Physiology and Nutritional Responsessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We labeled current uptake with ( 15 NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , which enabled direct quantification of NF compared with NP and their distribution in leaf growth of red oak seedlings. We tested the hypothesis that (1) fertilization increases photosynthetic rates and nutrient uptake in fertilized compared with unfertilized seedlings, and these responses partly explain the greater growth of the former plants, (2) a greater proportion of NF will meet the N demand in leaf growth of fertilized seedlings while unfertilized plants will rely entirely on NP for seasonal leaf growth and, (3) a strong relationship exists between SPAD meter readings with N determined by conventional wet-chemistry indices inferring good predictability of leaf N status with SPAD as noted elsewhere [6,56]. We focused on N because it is the nutrient element most commonly limiting plant growth and because its role in controlling plant growth and metabolism is well understood [7,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, the highest N addition (N 180) significantly decreased of Chl (a+b) at I 40 ( Figure 3). The effects of N addition on chlorophyll were in agreement with the previous findings in suger beet (Shaw et al, 2002;Van den Berg and Perkins, 2004). …”
Section: Leaf Chlorophyll Contentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Low concentrations of chlorophyll limit photosynthetic potential directly and lead to a decrease in biomass production in the plants (Molinari et al, 2007;Van den Berg and Perkins, 2004). In this study, the concentrations of leaf Chl (a+b) was significantly influenced by N supply and water treatments in isabgol (p<0.01) (Figure 3).…”
Section: Leaf Chlorophyll Contentmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Strong relationship between CCI and nitrogen was also reported in sugar maple (Acer saccharum Morsh.) (Van den Berg and Perkins 2004), and rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Peng et al 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%