1988
DOI: 10.1515/jpme.1988.16.2.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a prescreening blood donor program for prevention of perinatal transfusion-acquired cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all CMV-TTI, the diagnosis was made through the DNA virus detection in pharyngeal swabs and urine (10 patients), and bloodstream (5 patients). Each patient received a median number of 5.5 RBC units (range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Four patients were also given PLT (2 patients) or plasma (2 patients) transfusions.…”
Section: Five-year Experience At Our Neonatologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In all CMV-TTI, the diagnosis was made through the DNA virus detection in pharyngeal swabs and urine (10 patients), and bloodstream (5 patients). Each patient received a median number of 5.5 RBC units (range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Four patients were also given PLT (2 patients) or plasma (2 patients) transfusions.…”
Section: Five-year Experience At Our Neonatologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Phase 2: 439 /RBC, CMV IgM was performed on the day of donation: only CMV IgM negative donors were used. NA Bhumbra et al [ 9 ] Newborns with BW < 2,000g Total enrolled 137: 137/RBC 13/fresh frozen plasma Not specified/granulocyte At beginning, all donors were seronegative but 16 (0.7 %) seroconverted during the study. All mothers were seronegative Two infants developed CMV infection and viruria after each received CMV seropositive blood (these units were mistakenly identified as CMV seronegative due to technical errors or poor sensitivity of the test kit).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations