2019
DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00035-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a re-useable bronchoscopy biosimulator with ventilated lungs

Abstract: BackgroundRestrictions on respiratory trainee time and access to procedures reduce the opportunities to acquire necessary skills in bronchoscopy. Simulation, not subject to such impediments, is a useful supplementary aid to teaching bronchoscopic techniques in a safe environment but there is a limited choice of simulators that are sufficiently realistic and not prohibitively expensive. This study evaluated a low-cost device that simulates an intubated and ventilated patient, employing re-useable, inflatable, B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The porcine tracheobronchial system shares morphological characteristics with that of the human, including similar tracheal length, bronchiolar segmentation, and bronchiolar diameter. Moreover, both porcine and human bronchioles have a highly differentiated pseudostratified epithelial lining and submucosa with submucosal glands and airway smooth muscle [25,37,38] making the pig lung the favoured animal model to train bronchoscopists [39][40][41] and therefore the best choice to model bronchial thermoplasty in the human. We found the maximal temperature of the airway wall was ∼83°C at the bronchial thermoplasty contact points; significantly higher than the intervening wall which reached a maximum of only 60°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porcine tracheobronchial system shares morphological characteristics with that of the human, including similar tracheal length, bronchiolar segmentation, and bronchiolar diameter. Moreover, both porcine and human bronchioles have a highly differentiated pseudostratified epithelial lining and submucosa with submucosal glands and airway smooth muscle [25,37,38] making the pig lung the favoured animal model to train bronchoscopists [39][40][41] and therefore the best choice to model bronchial thermoplasty in the human. We found the maximal temperature of the airway wall was ∼83°C at the bronchial thermoplasty contact points; significantly higher than the intervening wall which reached a maximum of only 60°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the ability to simulate tissue sampling is essential when choosing a simulation model for training of bronchoscopy. Porcine lungs have been evaluated as a supplement to teaching of bronchoscopic techniques, including tissue sampling procedures [ 21 ]. In this study, all bronchoscopists attempted the biopsy procedure in all for models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human cadavers have been used in training bronchoscopic procedures and were favored over manikin models for educational purposes [17,18], which is in consistency with the findings of this study. Porcine lungs are promising models for hands-on training of bronchoscopic procedures and the histological structure of the respiratory tract is similar to humans [19][20][21]. However, the difference in anatomy was commented on by multiple participants.…”
Section: Anatomical Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though, there is to mention that several trials have shown, that also low fidelity simulators, as 3D-printed models of the bronchial tree are effective for acquiring basic flexible bronchoscopy skills [ 8 11 ] by presenting an equal or even more realistic imaging compared to the high-fidelity models [ 9 , 10 , 12 ]. Other, less investigated models are available, for example one study used a low-cost device that simulates an intubated and ventilated patient, employing re-useable, inflatable, BioFlex-preserved, porcine lungs, with similar effects on trainee performance realism of the bronchial tree and usability [ 13 ]. For programs with budgetary constraints those models can be an alternative [ 14 ], as costs are significantly lower, ranging from 40 to 250 US$ [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%