2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a robotic arm-assisted endoscope to facilitate endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the dissection speed was calculated as 92.7 mm 2 /min. This outcome shows that the dissection using K‐FLEX was almost two times faster compared with the result of a previous procedure that the same operator conducted using a standard endoscope (47.5 mm 2 /min) . We observed that the difference mainly came from the traction and cutting motion in various directions, facilitated by the enhanced dexterity of the bimanual arm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the dissection speed was calculated as 92.7 mm 2 /min. This outcome shows that the dissection using K‐FLEX was almost two times faster compared with the result of a previous procedure that the same operator conducted using a standard endoscope (47.5 mm 2 /min) . We observed that the difference mainly came from the traction and cutting motion in various directions, facilitated by the enhanced dexterity of the bimanual arm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…This outcome shows that the dissection using K-FLEX was almost two times faster compared with the result of a previous procedure that the same operator conducted using a standard endoscope (47.5 mm 2 /min). 17 We observed that the difference mainly came from the traction and cutting motion in various directions, facilitated by the enhanced dexterity of the bimanual arm. It was confirmed that the desired lesion of the tissue could be successfully manipulated and dissected using the proposed robot.…”
Section: Benchtop Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…h) Portable endoscopic tool handler: The portable endoscopic tool handler (PETH) by the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, South Korea, is an articulated robotic arm that can be attached to a commercial gastroscope or colonoscope [154]. This robot arm has two DoFs for bending and a commercial endoscopic instrument, such as forceps, that can be introduced through a working channel made inside the robot arm.…”
Section: B) R-scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…New traction devices to facilitate ESD have come into play, such as the through-the-scope Tracmotion device by Fujifilm (Lexington, MA, USA). Robotic manipulation devices such as the EndoMaster EASE System (EndoMaster Pte Ltd., Singapore) that can actively guide accessory instruments in various directions to allow for easier retraction and dissection are also being studied in animal models [ 64 , 65 ]. All of these advances aim to facilitate the performance and safety of ESD and increase utilization.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%