2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2005.tb00192.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Single‐monochromator Diode Array Spectroradiometer for Sunbed UV‐radiation Measurements

Abstract: The suitability of a new technology single‐monochromator diode array spectroradiometer for UV‐radiation safety measurements, in particular for sunbed measurements, was evaluated. The linearity, cosine response, temperature response, wavelength scale, stray‐light and slit function of the spectroradiometer were determined and their effects on the measurement accuracy evaluated. The main error sources were stray‐light and nonideal cosine response, for which correction methods are presented. Without correction, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spectral (energy) irradiance (W m −2 nm −1 ) was measured with a CCD array spectroradiometer Maya 2000 Pro (Ocean Optics, Dunedin, FL, USA) attached via a fiber‐optic cable (FC‐UV400‐2 400‐μm, Avantes, Leatherhead, UK) to a D7‐H‐SMA cosine diffuser (Bentham Instruments Ltd., Reading, UK) with spectral range of 200–1,100 nm. The spectroradiometer was calibrated by the Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) (Ylianttila, Visuri, Huurto, & Jokela, ) prior to the measurements in early spring, to allow accurate recording of outdoor solar radiation from the UV‐B to the near‐infrared. A further stray‐light correction for the UV and “dark noise” correction were applied to each recording of solar spectral irradiance, through its repetition with a polycarbonate cap over the diffuser blocking solar UV radiation (UV‐B 280–315 nm plus UV‐A 315–400 nm) and a dark cap over the diffuser blocking UV and visible solar radiation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral (energy) irradiance (W m −2 nm −1 ) was measured with a CCD array spectroradiometer Maya 2000 Pro (Ocean Optics, Dunedin, FL, USA) attached via a fiber‐optic cable (FC‐UV400‐2 400‐μm, Avantes, Leatherhead, UK) to a D7‐H‐SMA cosine diffuser (Bentham Instruments Ltd., Reading, UK) with spectral range of 200–1,100 nm. The spectroradiometer was calibrated by the Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) (Ylianttila, Visuri, Huurto, & Jokela, ) prior to the measurements in early spring, to allow accurate recording of outdoor solar radiation from the UV‐B to the near‐infrared. A further stray‐light correction for the UV and “dark noise” correction were applied to each recording of solar spectral irradiance, through its repetition with a polycarbonate cap over the diffuser blocking solar UV radiation (UV‐B 280–315 nm plus UV‐A 315–400 nm) and a dark cap over the diffuser blocking UV and visible solar radiation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ocean Optics spectrographs are not suitable for measuring solar spectra in the UV‐B region without modifications because their stray light rejection is insufficient. Even in measuring sun‐bed irradiance, a much less demanding application, great care is needed in processing UV‐B data [ Ylianttila et al , 2005]. The multichannel (CCD type) detector in D'Antoni et al 's [2007] spectroradiometer may be particularly susceptible to spectral scattering [ Kostkowski , 1997], especially with the high flux from the background of sunlight.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to convert the measured signals into reasonable radiation data, sensitive stray-light corrections are needed in the UV-B, which requires a thorough analysis of the instrumental stray-light characteristics (e.g. Kanaya et al, 2003;Eckstein et al, 2003;Jäkel et al, 2005;Ylianttila et al, 2005).…”
Section: Spectroradiometers For Actinic-flux Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since spectrograph systems offer a number of advantages compared to scanning systems, more accurate methods for the stray-light correction in the UV-B are highly desirable and remain subject to ongoing research (e.g. Ylianttila et al, 2005).…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%