2016
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe809149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Teaching Assistant Program for Third-Year Pharmacy Students

Abstract: Objectives. To determine if a teaching assistant (TA) program for third-year pharmacy students (PY3s) improves confidence in teaching abilities. Additionally, 3 assessment methods (faculty, student, and TA self-evaluations) were compared for similarities and correlations.Methods. An application and interview process was used to select 21 pharmacy students to serve as TAs for the Pharmaceutical Care Laboratory course for 2 semesters. Participants' self-perceived confidence in teaching abilities was assessed at … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, academic institutions offer peer and near‐peer teaching programs to stimulate students' knowledge and interest in a career in academia (Bradley et al, ); to improve teaching and communication skills and confidence (Lachman et al, ; Agius et al, ); and to improve the academic performance of students who participate (for a review, see Santee and Garavalia, ). Indeed, previous studies comparing the academic performance of students who received peer teaching to that of students who received no additional teaching found an improvement in the academic performance of students who participated (Benè and Bergus, ; Han et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, academic institutions offer peer and near‐peer teaching programs to stimulate students' knowledge and interest in a career in academia (Bradley et al, ); to improve teaching and communication skills and confidence (Lachman et al, ; Agius et al, ); and to improve the academic performance of students who participate (for a review, see Santee and Garavalia, ). Indeed, previous studies comparing the academic performance of students who received peer teaching to that of students who received no additional teaching found an improvement in the academic performance of students who participated (Benè and Bergus, ; Han et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%