The United States aims to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, which will require the construction of over 500 GWe of new, firm, zero-emission electrical power, with at least 200 GWe met by new nuclear generating capacity. This study compares the labor requirements for deploying 200 GWe of small modular light water reactors (SM-LWRs) and large modular light water reactors (LM-LWRs) using the Nuclear Cost Estimation Tool (NCET). Results show that deploying SM-LWRs, such as the 300 MWe SM-BWR (based on the BWRX-300) and 924 MWe MMNC (NuScale Voygr) designs, would require a significantly larger total labor force compared to LM-LWRs like the 1,117 MWe LPSR (AP1000) and 1,350 MWe LM-BWR (ABWR) designs. Deploying 200 GWe of SMBWRs would necessitate a perpetual direct construction workforce of 116,904, nearly twice that of LPSR (62,372) or LM-BWR (60,648). The analysis also found that the large modular LWR surrogate designs exhibited a slightly higher ratio of offsite to onsite work compared to the SMR surrogate designs, contrary to the purported advantage of increased offsite manufacturing for SMRs. Given the immense scale of deployment required, the potential early learning advantages of SMRs are largely offset in fleet deployment scenarios. The study concludes that LM-LWRs offer significant advantages over SM-LWRs in terms of total labor requirements for large-scale nuclear deployments.