2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a virtual coaching system eHealth intervention: A mixed methods observational cohort study in the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, when patients are experts, they know what they are doing, but the technology did not take that into account and gave generic advice. The importance of more in-depth coaching content was also shown previously within virtual coaching for health behaviour change in general [37].…”
Section: Implications For Design Of Self-management Ehealth For Copdsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In particular, when patients are experts, they know what they are doing, but the technology did not take that into account and gave generic advice. The importance of more in-depth coaching content was also shown previously within virtual coaching for health behaviour change in general [37].…”
Section: Implications For Design Of Self-management Ehealth For Copdsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Eysenbach [30] described this event as the law of attrition in eHealth studies. The law of attrition we experienced in our study does not differ a lot from other eHealth studies (e.g., [31][32][33][34]). However, despite the decline in active users, we also noticed that there were quite a few participants who continued using LEAVES even after the 10-weeks of the study period.…”
Section: Main Ndingsmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…Studies on preferences regarding agent characters have shown that age is a deciding factor when it comes to choosing a digital companion. For instance, in Hurmuz et al ( 2022 ), older adults preferred personalized content when interacting with a digital companion. Furthermore, when looking at the features of a digital companion in terms of friendliness, expertise, reliability, authority, and involvement, the general and elderly population preferred a gendered digital companion, specifically a young female (ter Stal et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%