2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a visual feedback system in gait retraining: A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned below, the reduced LDS while walking with augmented feedback might be a result of 1) a reduction in gait speed, 2) a more conscious or controlled walking and 3) a consequence of the manipulation of pelvis and trunk kinematics: 1) Our results showed a decrease in gait speed (previously reported in [2]) and LDS while subjects were using the augmented feedback system. Since an emphasis on movement accuracy reduces walking speed [16], our subjects presumably walked slower because of the more conscious control of gait parameters (when adjusting actual movements with the predefined physiological movements).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned below, the reduced LDS while walking with augmented feedback might be a result of 1) a reduction in gait speed, 2) a more conscious or controlled walking and 3) a consequence of the manipulation of pelvis and trunk kinematics: 1) Our results showed a decrease in gait speed (previously reported in [2]) and LDS while subjects were using the augmented feedback system. Since an emphasis on movement accuracy reduces walking speed [16], our subjects presumably walked slower because of the more conscious control of gait parameters (when adjusting actual movements with the predefined physiological movements).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Data was taken from a previously reported study [2]. In ten women (age: mean=61 years, SD=4 years) with abnormal gait patterns (caused by THR: n=2, pain in lumbar spine: n=4, pain in pectoral girdle: n=2, pain in knee joint: n=2, leg length discrepancy of 2 cm: n=1), kinematic gait data of normal walking and of walking while the subjects simultaneously received visual augmented feedback was collected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations