2015
DOI: 10.5530/jyp.2015.4s.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Adherence to Therapy In Patients of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate adherence to therapy and study factors associated with non-adherence in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional, questionnaire based study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital. 150 patients suffering from type 2 DM since six months or more were interviewed using self-designed, semistructured questionnaire to get information about adherence to medication, diet/exercise schedule and self-monitoring of blood glucose. Morisky medicatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
17
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, inadequate health literacy hinders these practices, leading to irrational diabetes management and early occurrence of diabetic complications such as peripheral neuropathy, renal and ophthalmic complications [36]. High adherence to anti-diabetic medications was suboptimal (34%), which is comparable with the study conducted in Southwest Ethiopia [19], America [38] & [39] Tanzania [26], India [40] and Palestine [22]. In current study patients who have good adherence are more likely to achieve their glycemic control than those with low adherence.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Therefore, inadequate health literacy hinders these practices, leading to irrational diabetes management and early occurrence of diabetic complications such as peripheral neuropathy, renal and ophthalmic complications [36]. High adherence to anti-diabetic medications was suboptimal (34%), which is comparable with the study conducted in Southwest Ethiopia [19], America [38] & [39] Tanzania [26], India [40] and Palestine [22]. In current study patients who have good adherence are more likely to achieve their glycemic control than those with low adherence.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 64%
“…As per the study done in India, non-adherence rate was taken as 70%, and using the formula 4PQ/D 2 the sample size was calculated as 84 (d-10), however 100 patients were included in the study. 3 The interviewer administered a structured questionnaire to collect data. The questionnaire had three parts which included the demographic profile, Morisky's Instrument to measure the rate of non-adherence and the final part to assess factors and perceptions associated with non-adherence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low rates of SMBG of 34% and 19% have been shown in other studies [19,54]. However, higher rates of SMBG (49%) have been reported in other studies [5,55]. Other studies have also reported an increase in SMBG in experimental group compared to control group [56] after mobile phone messaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%