1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00679.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of adrenal function in patients with hypothalamic and pituitary disorders: comparison of serum cortisol, urinary free cortisol and the human‐corticotrophin releasing hormone test with the insulin tolerance test

Abstract: Serum cortisol measurement at 0800 h is better than 1600 h and 24-h urinary free cortisol to evaluate adrenal function in this patient category. The diagnostic applicability of the h-CRH test is not superior to 0800 h serum cortisol measurement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnosis of secondary AI was based on internationally accepted biochemical criteria, principally early morning (08.00-09.00 h) serum cortisol measurements and, if necessary, an insulin tolerance test. Early morning cut-off cortisol levels for AI in our center were validated for patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disorders as published previously [15]. Other pituitary hormone deficiencies were adequately replaced when necessary for at least 6 months prior to study entry and treatment remained stable during the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of secondary AI was based on internationally accepted biochemical criteria, principally early morning (08.00-09.00 h) serum cortisol measurements and, if necessary, an insulin tolerance test. Early morning cut-off cortisol levels for AI in our center were validated for patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disorders as published previously [15]. Other pituitary hormone deficiencies were adequately replaced when necessary for at least 6 months prior to study entry and treatment remained stable during the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ITT, however, is unpleasant, highly resource intensive as it needs medical supervision and is contraindicated in infants, patients with a history of seizures and cardiovascular disease and may occasionally give misleading results 2 3. Human corticotrophin-releasing hormone (hCRH) test is also found to be an acceptable method to assess the HPA axis as the CRH stimulates the HPA axis at a higher anatomical level than ACTH 4 5. However, this method is rarely used in the paediatric setting and there is currently no consensus about what is the most appropriate test for assessing the integrity of the HPA axis in children 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, studies of dynamic CRH testing in other clinical situations of hypothalamic-pituitary insufficiency (i.e., not postoperative) have also reported contradictory results with regard to CRH response rates. 22,39,53 In general, results have been highly variable in determining useful criteria for evaluating CRH stimulation data, and there has been no established added benefit over measurement of static serum cortisol levels. 37,38 …”
Section: Crh Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%