2019
DOI: 10.1177/1471301219887038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of AID-COM, a communication-focused program for family carers of people with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease: A pilot study (innovative practice)

Abstract: Families providing care to relatives with Alzheimer's disease are quickly destabilized by changes that disrupt communication. This pilot mixed-design study aimed to provide a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a communication-based training program for carers of people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD). Five participants received three training sessions. The use of communication strategies by participants and their effectiveness were evaluated before and after the training, and a focus group wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total duration of the intervention ranged from 1.5 hours to 12.5 hours, with the mean duration being 5.86 hours. Two low‐quality studies did not include information on session length so were not included in the data for session duration and total duration (Chesneau et al, 2019; Silvestri et al, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The total duration of the intervention ranged from 1.5 hours to 12.5 hours, with the mean duration being 5.86 hours. Two low‐quality studies did not include information on session length so were not included in the data for session duration and total duration (Chesneau et al, 2019; Silvestri et al, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although generally demonstrating clear objectives, robust designs and appropriate outcomes, these studies tended to use small sample sizes, have insufficient use of a control group and not consider or control for confounds. Chesneau et al (2019) scored the lowest quality rating (0.43) as the sample size was very small, the participant characteristics were not sufficiently described and the objectives were not clearly stated. One other study fell into the low‐quality category for scoring 0.50 (Silvestri et al, 2004) for similar reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatively, sharing one's daily life with a PwMND may make one more sensitive to positive changes in functioning. Moreover, carers may need communication interventions specifically designed for them (Chesneau et al., 2021).…”
Section: Well‐beingmentioning
confidence: 99%