2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of albedo enhancement to mitigate impacts of urban heat island in Rome (Italy) using WRF meteorological model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the albedo of road increased from 0.2 to 0.45, the daily-averaged urban heat island intensity of the urban area decreased by about 0.1 • C in Montreal [83]. Similarly, in Rome, a higher improvement of urban temperature is noticed during the daytime where temperature is decreased by 4 • C if the albedo of surfaces increases [84]. The model in Prague and Brno suggests that an albedo increased by 0.25 leads to a difference of −0.2 • C in daily average temperature, while an albedo increased by 0.5 leads to a daily average temperature difference of −0.5 • C in Prague and −0.4 • C in Brno [82], which also proves the negative linear relationship between the albedo and air temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When the albedo of road increased from 0.2 to 0.45, the daily-averaged urban heat island intensity of the urban area decreased by about 0.1 • C in Montreal [83]. Similarly, in Rome, a higher improvement of urban temperature is noticed during the daytime where temperature is decreased by 4 • C if the albedo of surfaces increases [84]. The model in Prague and Brno suggests that an albedo increased by 0.25 leads to a difference of −0.2 • C in daily average temperature, while an albedo increased by 0.5 leads to a daily average temperature difference of −0.5 • C in Prague and −0.4 • C in Brno [82], which also proves the negative linear relationship between the albedo and air temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A typical and largely used tool of this type is represented by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model [9], which properly takes into account the reflections among different urban surfaces and between these and the atmosphere. Recently, this approach has been applied to the area of Rome [10], whose urban climate is modelled in order of evaluating the modification of the UHI intensity subsequent to an increase of the albedo of the horizontal surfaces of the built area.…”
Section: Urban Heat Island and Buildings Albedomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, analysis of WRF variability has typically been limited to modifying small fragments of the model. For example, studies may change: urban models (Cui & de Foy, 2012; Holt & Pullen, 2007); land‐use products (Feng Chen et al, 2014; De Meij & Vinuesa, 2014; J. Wang et al, 2016); urban parameters, such as building heights or albedo (Lin et al, 2008; Miao et al, 2009; Morini et al, 2018; Touchaei & Wang, 2015); physics schemes (García‐Díez et al, 2013; Kleczek et al, 2014); synoptic conditions (X. X. Li et al, 2013; X. X. Li & Norford, 2016); or initial condition data sources (Gallus & Bresch, 2006; Wu et al, 2005). Several studies combine some of the above, that is, using multiphysics or parameter approaches (Crétat et al, 2012; Evans et al, 2012; Imran et al, 2018; Jankov et al, 2007; Jerez et al, 2013; Mooney et al, 2017; Sharma et al, 2017; Stegehuis et al, 2015; Wan & Zhong, 2014; Z. H. Wang et al, 2011; Zhong & Yang, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies may change: urban models (Cui & de Foy, 2012;Holt & Pullen, 2007); land-use products (Feng Chen et al, 2014;De Meij & Vinuesa, 2014;J. Wang et al, 2016); urban parameters, such as building heights or albedo (Lin et al, 2008;Miao et al, 2009;Morini et al, 2018;Touchaei & Wang, 2015); physics schemes (García-Díez et al, 2013;Kleczek et al, 2014); synoptic conditions (X. X. Li et al, 2013;X.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%