1989
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/46.9.1813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of allopurinol use in patients with gout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,12,21 Published studies revealed inappropriate indications for allopurinol in up to 86% of patients. 13,[22][23][24][25][26] In the EuroSCAR study the indications for allopurinol use were recorded in a nonsystematic manner and the patients' original charts were not reviewed. A comparison of allopurinol exposure between the previous SCAR study (1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993) and the current EuroSCAR study (1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001) showed a 2-to 3-fold increase in the exposure of control subjects and patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,12,21 Published studies revealed inappropriate indications for allopurinol in up to 86% of patients. 13,[22][23][24][25][26] In the EuroSCAR study the indications for allopurinol use were recorded in a nonsystematic manner and the patients' original charts were not reviewed. A comparison of allopurinol exposure between the previous SCAR study (1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993) and the current EuroSCAR study (1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001) showed a 2-to 3-fold increase in the exposure of control subjects and patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherence to accepted guidelines for the use of allopurinol 14 could lead to a significant decrease in morbidity and mortality from allopurinol-associated SJS or TEN. Based on the literature, which shows inappropriate allopurinol prescription in up to 86% of treated patients, 22,24 it may be assumed that up to 48 of 56 patients with SJS or TEN with recent intake of allopurinol in the EuroSCAR study could have been prevented. Based on the known incidence of SJS or TEN (2 cases/million population/y), the extrapolation of our results (14.8% of SJS or TEN cases induced by recent allopurinol use with a 32% death rate) to the whole European population (376 million) leads to an estimate that about 100 cases of SJS or TEN and as many as 30 deaths related to these reactions could be avoided each year in Europe by a more appropriate use of allopurinol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, 26 of the 32 patients (81%) who underwent desensitization had renal insufficiency; 18 of them (69%) were taking concomitant diuretics, and 21 (80%) were receiving 300 mg of allopurinol daily—an inappropriate dosage for their degree of renal insufficiency. Recent reports indicate that allopurinol, at a “standard” dosage of 300 mg/day, is the most frequently prescribed urate‐lowering drug(34, 35) and that not all physicians adjust the initial dosage according to the degree of renal insufficiency(35). In this study, daily allopurinol dosages following desensitization were considerably lower than the predesensitization dosages, further emphasizing the importance of dosage reduction in patients with renal impairment(26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis, affecting 7.5 million adults in the US and, commensurate with the obesity epidemic, is increasing in prevalence (). The deleterious effect of urate deposition on physical function and health‐related quality of life is associated with increased health care costs () but can be improved with appropriate pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management, including urate‐lowering therapy (ULT) and dietary modification, respectively (). Comorbidities, however, limit the choice and dose of pharmacologic therapy, and nonpharmacologic modalities become essential options in gout management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%