“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The rationale for slow attenuation is manifold, including reduced risk of life-threatening portal hypertension, speculation that slow occlusion may reduce the risk of post-ligation neurologic dysfunction, reduced operating time, less extensive intraoperative monitoring, and the fact that animals undergoing complete shunt occlusion have a better long-term prognosis than those undergoing partial attenuation only. 13,14 Two methods of slow occlusion using extravascular techniques have been reported: the ameroid constrictor (ameroid ring) [2][3][4][7][8][9]11,12 and cellophane bands. 1,5,10 Results of ameroid constrictor application have been encouraging, although a high incidence of multiple acquired shunts has been identified in published studies and anecdotally ( RM Bright, personal communication, 2000).…”