2003
DOI: 10.21236/ada421218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an Alcohol Misuse Prevention Program in a Military Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high rates of hazardous use of alcohol among military service members is both a major personal problem for individual service impulsiveness. We were able to achieve follow-up rates that are much higher than those reported in other military populations [25,26], but only achieved our goal of 80% in the EUC group. Also, as evident in Table 3, despite randomization the EUC was markedly lower on this measure at baseline than the two intervention groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The high rates of hazardous use of alcohol among military service members is both a major personal problem for individual service impulsiveness. We were able to achieve follow-up rates that are much higher than those reported in other military populations [25,26], but only achieved our goal of 80% in the EUC group. Also, as evident in Table 3, despite randomization the EUC was markedly lower on this measure at baseline than the two intervention groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The SIP also assesses a broader range of the consequences of hazardous alcohol use, including physical health, interpersonal functioning, intrapersonal factors such as mood and guilt, fulfilling personal responsibilities and general impulsiveness. We were able to achieve follow‐up rates that are much higher than those reported in other military populations [25, 26], but only achieved our goal of 80% in the EUC group. Also, as evident in Table 3, despite randomization the EUC was markedly lower on this measure at baseline than the two intervention groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations