Evaluation of an alternative chlorine production process for energy saving toward sustainability

Abstract

Exergetic‐based solutions are proposed in this work to reduce the energy footprint of an alternative chlorine production process. By presenting exergy analysis results in the form of visualized exergetic process flowsheets using a solution panel, this study does not only find the low‐exergy‐efficient unit operations, but also proposes ways to improve the exergy efficiency based on the major sources of irreversibility of individual unit operations. Based on the amount of exergy losses, the alternative chlorine production process is divided into three main functional blocks. The total internal and external exergy losses for the entire process are calculated as 14,523.5 and 286.1 kJ/kg, respectively. The electrolysis block shows the highest potential for improvements with the largest exergy loss (responsible for more than 96.0% of total losses; with 14,093.2 kJ/kg of internal losses and 146.5 kJ/kg of external losses). Isothermal mixing, lower reaction temperature, and reduced pressure drop are suggested as avenues for improvement. Exergy losses in the gas treatment block with total exergy losses of 411.7 kJ/kg (equivalent to 2.8% of total losses) are mainly due to the cooling column (241.9 kJ/kg), where modifications in column might be helpful as concentration and temperature gradients along the tower are sources of exergy loss. The highest exergy loss in the feed pretreatment block with the total exergy losses of 158.2 kJ/kg (i.e., 1.1% of total losses) belongs to the mixers (106 kJ/kg) where isothermal and also isobaric mixing is required. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 35: 1512–1520, 2016

The multi-scale challenges of biomass fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading: Review of the state of art and future research directions

“…Energy integration could also lead to beneficial environmental savings by increasing energy efficiency, and thus reducing the external energy demand. Furthermore, detailed exergy analysis can help to improve the overall energy efficiency of the process [690] and there are good examples of this for other processes in the literature [691][692][693][694][695][696]. Furthermore, biomass fractionation, into relatively high concentration streams of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, may provide an opportunity to reduce the costs.…”

Exergetic environmental sustainability assessment supported by Monte Carlo simulations: A case study of a chlorine production process

“…Chlorine is a highly toxic substance that is reactive and enhances the combustion rate of other materials and is likely to limit the growth . Chlorine production is a highly energy‐intensive process and ranks among five major technologies with high exergy losses . High‐energy consumption along with extensive energy loss in turn leads to increased production costs and adverse environmental impacts.…”

“… evaluated the processing parameters and impacts on chloralkali products in an electrolysis‐centered chloralkali reactor, followed by examination of the photoelectrochemical chloralkali technology for hydrogen and sodium hydroxide production . A recent research proposed exergetic‐centered solutions to lessen the energy footprint of an alternative chlorine production by means of the visualized exergetic technology flowsheets, and the solutions panel. Nonetheless, in spite of the significance of the chlorine production process, there is not even a single research case study where exergetic approach and LCA were combined to augment environmental sustainability of the chlorine production.…”