2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291716002804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India: a mixed methods approach

Abstract: BackgroundStigma related to mental health is a major barrier to help-seeking resulting in a large treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study assessed changes in knowledge, attitude and behaviour, and stigma related to help-seeking among participants exposed to an anti-stigma campaign.MethodThe campaign, using multi-media interventions, was part of the SMART Mental Health Project, conducted for 3 months, across 42 villages in rural Andhra Pradesh, in South India. Mixed-methods evaluati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our use of a ‘social contact’ (in the form of a video of a person with mental illness narrating their experience) did not seem to have been used explicitly by the other two projects. Social contact is perceived as the most effective intervention for an anti-stigma campaign, 2 in agreement with our observations 8 . Second, in this article we are reporting the longitudinal outcomes of the intervention, whereas the other two studies only provide cross-sectional data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, our use of a ‘social contact’ (in the form of a video of a person with mental illness narrating their experience) did not seem to have been used explicitly by the other two projects. Social contact is perceived as the most effective intervention for an anti-stigma campaign, 2 in agreement with our observations 8 . Second, in this article we are reporting the longitudinal outcomes of the intervention, whereas the other two studies only provide cross-sectional data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The key components of this complex intervention focused on the delivery of mental health services for common mental disorders (CMDs) (stress, depression and suicide risk) and involved: conducting an anti-stigma campaign prior to the delivery of health services across the villages; training of primary healthcare workers, i.e. lay village health workers known as Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), and doctors on evidence-based tools; developing a mobile technology-based, electronic decision-support system based on those tools to facilitate the work of the health workers and doctors; and developing a system that provided a mechanism to follow-up with people with identifiable CMD using cloud computing and voice messages delivered through an algorithm-based, interactive voice-response system that provided reminders to patients, health workers and doctors 7 , 8 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement observed in one's health and contact with others who have similar conditions were reported to be facilitators of continued utilization of services. Contact with others who have the same condition, in direct or indirect ways, and group-based intervention can be useful for reducing stigma and decreasing a sense of isolation [26,27]. Availing services in a community-based well-being center rather than a crowded hospital setting was another factor that encouraged continued engagement with mental health services in the present sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is additional evidence that ASHA workers' beliefs and knowledge are receptive to change [1,7]. Nevertheless, ASHA workers are rarely targeted by community mental health awareness campaigns [12,27]. Considering the importance of ASHA workers in rural healthcare and their increasing participation in mental health interventions [5,13,21,28], they should be included in mental health education efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%