1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38798346637.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an automated microbiologic blood culture device for detection of bacteria in platelet components

Abstract: Data from this preliminary evaluation suggest that sampling times of 24 hours or more would be necessary to provide confidence in detection of E. coli or S. epidermidis in PCs using this culture method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
76
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
76
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, false-negative results caused by sampling errors are a problem for both microbiological and molecular genetic methods. Microbiological detection using 10 to 20 ml of platelet concentrate for aerobic and anaerobic cultivation is susceptible to false-positive results (37) and requires a long incubation time, while NAT assays should be sensitive and fast enough for a routine contamination screening of PCs. Therefore, we suggest the screening of PCs during the second day after donation, for which a satellite bag of the PCs should be used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, false-negative results caused by sampling errors are a problem for both microbiological and molecular genetic methods. Microbiological detection using 10 to 20 ml of platelet concentrate for aerobic and anaerobic cultivation is susceptible to false-positive results (37) and requires a long incubation time, while NAT assays should be sensitive and fast enough for a routine contamination screening of PCs. Therefore, we suggest the screening of PCs during the second day after donation, for which a satellite bag of the PCs should be used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of bacterial growth by culture methods is still the most sensitive method. A bacterial sterility test should be rapid, affordable, adequately sensitive, specific, and simple to perform (37). Only automated bacterial blood culturing systems meet many of the requirements of an ideal test because they detect a wide range of organisms at concentrations of only 1 to 10 CFU per ml (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture methods, which require a long time to demonstrate the presence of bacteria, have remained the preferred way for platelet bacteria screening, although bacteria in PCs have been detected with other approaches (18 ). A bacterial-detection test should be rapid, affordable, adequately sensitive, specific, and simple to perform (19,20 ). Although no single approach now meets all these criteria, molecular biological approaches offer promising opportunities for detecting contaminating organisms in blood components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The screening methods used by different centers are visual inspection, microscopic examination of stained smears, pH and glucose dipstick tests (29), and tests with automated culture systems (7,28). No screening method, however, satisfies the main requirements of high sensitivity, high specificity, and rapidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%