2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an ELISA to detect rabies antibodies in orally vaccinated foxes and raccoon dogs sampled in the field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study we were required to use a very high vaccine dose (10 8.0 FFU/mL) to increase the likelihood to observe any differences in vaccine uptake in MALT of the oral cavity of the various species at all. This could be the reason why all animals regardless of species exhibited RABV specific antibodies by day 10 pi (Table 3) as measured by the standard RFFIT 53 and the more sensitive ELISA 53,54 , irrespective of the identification of infected cells in the t. palatina. Therefore, other tissues in the oropharyngeal cavity must have been involved in virus uptake and subsequent interaction with the immune system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study we were required to use a very high vaccine dose (10 8.0 FFU/mL) to increase the likelihood to observe any differences in vaccine uptake in MALT of the oral cavity of the various species at all. This could be the reason why all animals regardless of species exhibited RABV specific antibodies by day 10 pi (Table 3) as measured by the standard RFFIT 53 and the more sensitive ELISA 53,54 , irrespective of the identification of infected cells in the t. palatina. Therefore, other tissues in the oropharyngeal cavity must have been involved in virus uptake and subsequent interaction with the immune system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding antibodies were detected by rabies virus specific inhibition ELISA according to manufacturer specifications (BioPro Rabies ELISA Ab kit, O.K. Servis BioPro, Prague, Czech Republic) 54 .…”
Section: Diagnostic Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the animals of group 4, which were mock immunized, demonstrated immune responses against the RABV G or MERS-COV S protein, confirming the specificity of the ELISAs. Whereas RABV G-specific ELISA titers are known to predict protection against RABV challenge (47)(48)(49), the protective abilities of the MERS-CoV S-directed antibodies are unknown. We therefore performed VNA assays against MERS-CoV using sera collected on day 35 postimmunization from mice of all four groups (Fig.…”
Section: Construction Of An Attenuated Rabv Expressing the Mers-cov Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the assessment of the actual vaccine-induced immunity the presence of neutralising antibodies in serum is recognised as the most reliable parameter for assessing the efficacy of vaccination because it is closely correlated with protection against rabies infection. Thus, it is considered an efficient and direct estimate of vaccination efficacy in the target population (Wasniewski et al 2013). Traditionally, recommended serological methods include the rapid fluorescent foci inhibition test (RFFIT) (Smith et al 1996) and the fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation test (FAVN) (Cliquet et al 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%