2003
DOI: 10.1192/pb.27.4.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an emergency response service

Abstract: Aims and MethodAn emergency response service (ERS) was introduced to streamline the assessment of individuals presenting in a crisis in one sector of a large provincial city. Data on service activity, clinical details and outcome were recorded on consecutive referrals to the service over the first 6 months of operation, and all patients were offered the opportunity to complete the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire.ResultsSeventy-five per cent of those referred accepted the offer of assessment, and the majority… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Johnson's two samples from 2005 37% and 40% had a psychotic disorder [ 8 , 9 ]. But the evidence is not wholly consistent; In a study of Barker et al from Edinburgh they found that 17% of the patients had psychotic symptoms [ 13 ]) and Tacchi found 13.5% with psychosis in a home treatment emergency response service in Newcastle [ 40 ]. With the lack of a randomized control group in this study, we cannot tell whether the patients would have progressed without CRT care (see the "Strengths and limitations" section below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Johnson's two samples from 2005 37% and 40% had a psychotic disorder [ 8 , 9 ]. But the evidence is not wholly consistent; In a study of Barker et al from Edinburgh they found that 17% of the patients had psychotic symptoms [ 13 ]) and Tacchi found 13.5% with psychosis in a home treatment emergency response service in Newcastle [ 40 ]. With the lack of a randomized control group in this study, we cannot tell whether the patients would have progressed without CRT care (see the "Strengths and limitations" section below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%