2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(00)00062-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an instrumented walkway for measurement of the kinematic parameters of gait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
99
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The binary threshold was determined post-hoc using sensitivity analyses (CV>4% for walking alone, CV>10% for walking backwards counting). Interestingly, the 4% CV cut-off found for our study sample while walking alone supports previously reported data from community-dwelling older adults, in which the mean CV of fallers were identified at 4.1%, compared with 2.4% in non-fallers and 1.9% in young adults (22).…”
Section: Relationship Between Occurrence Of First Fall Events During supporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The binary threshold was determined post-hoc using sensitivity analyses (CV>4% for walking alone, CV>10% for walking backwards counting). Interestingly, the 4% CV cut-off found for our study sample while walking alone supports previously reported data from community-dwelling older adults, in which the mean CV of fallers were identified at 4.1%, compared with 2.4% in non-fallers and 1.9% in young adults (22).…”
Section: Relationship Between Occurrence Of First Fall Events During supporting
confidence: 90%
“…To ensure safety, a fabric belt 7 cm wide was placed around each subject's waist, for easy grasp by a research assistant who walked beside the walkway, slightly behind the subjects, during all trials. Stride time in both walking conditions was determined during steady-state walking using a GAITRite ® -System (GAITRite Gold, CIR Systems, PA, USA), (20,22,28,29), consisting of a 10-m long carpet with an integrated, pressure-sensitive electronic surface of 7.32 x 0.61 m connected to a personal portable computer via an interface cable. The pressure-sensitive surface includes a series of sensors (total 13,824) placed every 1.27 cm, with their centers placed in a 48 x 288 grid, and activated by mechanical pressure.…”
Section: Gait Analysis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method is a useful means of following up the parameters of interest. Gaitrite 1 , the validity of which was previously established (Cutlip et al 2000;Bilney et al 2003) has been used to analyse gait in a few neurological pathologies such as Parkinson's disease (Nelson et al 2002); no studies seem to have been carried out with Gaitrite 1 on gait in CMT patients with bracing, although Metaxiotis et al (2000) have performed a dynamic pedobarography study on cavovarus foot deformity in CMT, in which they recorded the pre-and post-operative pressure parameters and foot contact areas. This study made it possible to assess and classify cavovarus feet and to objectively quantify the components of equino-cavo-varus foot.…”
Section: Quantitative Assessment Of Spatial and Temporal Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devices used for these measurements are based mainly in two technologies: (a) capturing video images and (b) quantifying the distribution of the step pressure by means of a high number of sensors on force platforms and walkways [3][4] [5]. The availability of these devices is usually limited by price and also by their requirements on installation and specialized personnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%