Evaluation of an integrated intervention to reduce psychological distress and intimate partner violence in refugees: Results from the Nguvu cluster randomized feasibility trial

Abstract

Introduction The complex relationship between intimate partner violence and psychological distress warrants an integrated intervention approach. In this study we examined the relevance, acceptability, and feasibility of evaluating a multi-sectoral integrated violence- and mental health-focused intervention (Nguvu). Methods We enrolled 311 Congolese refugee women from Nyarugusu refugee camp in Tanzania with past-year intimate partner violence and elevated psychological distress in a feasibility cluster randomized trial. Women were recruited from local women’s groups that were randomized to the Nguvu intervention or usual care. Participants from women’s groups randomized to Nguvu received 8 weekly sessions delivered by lay refugee incentive workers. Psychological distress, intimate partner violence, other wellbeing, and process indicators were assessed at baseline and 9-weeks post-enrollment to evaluate relevance, acceptability, and feasibility of implementing and evaluating Nguvu in refugee contexts. Results We found that Nguvu was relevant to the needs of refugee women affected by intimate partner violence. We found reductions in some indicators of psychological distress, but did not identify sizeable changes in partner violence over time. Overall, we found that Nguvu was acceptable and feasible. However, challenges to the research protocol included baseline imbalances between study conditions, differential intervention completion related to intimate partner violence histories, differences between Nguvu groups and facilitators, and some indication that Nguvu may be less beneficial for participants with more severe intimate partner violence profiles. Conclusions We found evidence supporting the relevance of Nguvu to refugee women affected by partner violence and psychological distress and moderate evidence supporting the acceptability and feasibility of evaluating and implementing this intervention in a complex refugee setting. A definitive cluster randomized trial requires further adaptations for recruitment and eligibility screening, randomization, and retention. Trial registration ISRCTN65771265, June 27, 2016.

Ten years of tracking mental health in refugee primary health care settings: an updated analysis of data from UNHCR’s Health Information System (2009–2018)

“…Not only do primary health care workers within refugee contexts need to be better equipped to address common mental health conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety, PTSD, and substance use), but more also needs to be done to provide treatment and support outside of health facilities. As mentioned previously, the recent surge in research around “scalable psychological interventions” in humanitarian settings provides increasing opportunities to administer brief, evidence-based psychological therapies that can be delivered by trained and supervised non-specialist providers, including refugees themselves [ 49 – 51 , 64 ]. Again, efforts towards this action are ongoing.…”

Multilevel Determinants of Integrated Service Delivery for Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health in Humanitarian Settings

“…To examine the factors that influenced implementation at the program level, we gathered data from a qualitative process evaluation which followed the completion of a cluster-randomized feasibility trial of Nguvu [ 48 ]. We conducted 29 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with stakeholders including 10 of the 158 Nguvu program participants, 10 intervention facilitators, 2 clinical and project supervisors, 3 representatives from implementing agencies, and 4 Congolese members of the community advisory board.…”

SH+ 360: novel model for scaling up a mental health and psychosocial support programme in humanitarian settings

“…The operational component of a scale-up model is a key feature that guides planning, implementation and learning and enables successful scaling up of interventions. 18 As multi-sectoral integration requires strong partnerships and collaboration outside traditional siloes, 8 the operational component of the SH+ 360 model relies heavily on developing and maintaining strong partnerships between organisations. The goal of each partnership is to scale up SH+ delivery and reach new populations by developing partner internal capacity to deliver SH+ fully and independently, with a high level of quality, to meet the mental health and psychosocial needs of specific populations, drawing on HealthRight International's extensive experience with SH+ implementation and evaluation.…”

“…protection from violence and livelihoods). 8,9 For example, people who experience poverty are at higher risk of common mental disorders, and these common mental disorders in turn elevate the risk of (further) experiences of poverty. 10 Addressing these interlinked concerns may result in more sustainable and cost-efficient impacts.…”

“…7 These recommendations are supported by growing recognition of the need to more holistically address population needs in humanitarian settings, given that the well-being of crisis-affected populations is determined by interrelated health and social factors. 8 Multi-sectoral integration requires strong partnerships and collaboration outside traditional siloes. 8 In addition to more comprehensively addressing humanitarian needs, multi-sectoral integration may also facilitate more rapid and widespread scale-up of evidence-based MHPSS interventions within diverse types of existing humanitarian programming, as this provides more opportunities for implementation.…”