2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for pharmaceuticals in fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
74
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Instrumentation parameters, separation strategy, detection of target analytes, calibration method and method detection limits (MDLs) generally followed previously reported methods [20]. In this study, MDLs represented the lowest concentrations of an analyte that were reported with 99% confidence that the concentration is different from zero in a given matrix.…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Study Site And Field Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Instrumentation parameters, separation strategy, detection of target analytes, calibration method and method detection limits (MDLs) generally followed previously reported methods [20]. In this study, MDLs represented the lowest concentrations of an analyte that were reported with 99% confidence that the concentration is different from zero in a given matrix.…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Study Site And Field Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma sample extraction followed a slightly modified methodology [24]. Similarly, this tissue sample extraction protocol generally followed previously developed methodologies [8,20]. Detailed information regarding mass, length and composite groupings is provided in the electronic supplementary material, table S2.…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Study Site And Field Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A 500-μL aliquot of undiluted or diluted exposure water samples was combined with 450 μL of 0.1% formic acid (w/w) and spiked with 50 μL of an internal standard mixture (DPH-d 3 and DZN-d 10 ) in an autosampler vial before analyses. Instrumentation and strategies for separation and detection of target analytes were primarily described elsewhere (25,26 …”
Section: Chemicals and Analytical Verification Of Treatment Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%