2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating confectionery wastewater at long-term operation under different organic loading rates: Performance and membrane fouling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other recent studies (2020-2021) used AnMBR technology to treat real industrial wastewater. Table 2 shows their performances [20,21,22,23]. The performance achieved in our study based on the OLR is higher than in most studies shown.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Recent Studies Using Anmbrmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Other recent studies (2020-2021) used AnMBR technology to treat real industrial wastewater. Table 2 shows their performances [20,21,22,23]. The performance achieved in our study based on the OLR is higher than in most studies shown.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Recent Studies Using Anmbrmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The results are very well in agreement with the literature on COD removal by AnMBRs with a minimum of 67% been reported for wastewaters from the food industry (Dvorák et al, 2016 ). The COD removal efficiency typically depends on the OLR of the reactor (Balcioǧlu et al, 2021 ). From the literature it can be gathered that AnMBRs can operate at varied OLRs, with low OLR providing better pollutant removal at higher biomass concentration in the reactor and high OLRs favoring stabilized treatment efficiency with active biomass retained by the membranes (Balcioǧlu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COD removal efficiency typically depends on the OLR of the reactor (Balcioǧlu et al, 2021 ). From the literature it can be gathered that AnMBRs can operate at varied OLRs, with low OLR providing better pollutant removal at higher biomass concentration in the reactor and high OLRs favoring stabilized treatment efficiency with active biomass retained by the membranes (Balcioǧlu et al, 2021 ). Wijekoon et al ( 2011 ) reported that the COD removal efficiency increased with OLR reaching a maximum removal efficiency of 80% at an OLR of 8.0 (± 0.3) g COD/L d, but decreased to almost 60% at an OLR of 12.0 (± 0.2) g COD/L d when treating a synthetic wastewater using a thermophilic AnMBR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SMP in the retentates were measured for obtaining the SMP in four ranges of molecular weight: MW < 1 kDa, 1 kDa < MW < 10 kDa, 10 kDa < MW < 100 kDa, and MW > 100 kDa. The calculations based on COD mass balance are shown in Equations (4) to (7).…”
Section: Smp Molecular Weight Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MW > 100 kDa = 0.02 × SMP ret 100 kDa (7) where SMP sol (mg COD/L) is the SMP content in the initial 30 mL sample, and SMP ret (mg COD/L) is from the 20 mL retentate obtained in each ultrafiltration; to calculate SMP, measurements of COD, VFAs, carbohydrates, and proteins were required, according to the definition given previously.…”
Section: Smp Molecular Weight Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%