Evaluation of Annagnps on Mississippi Delta Msea Watersheds

Yuan, Yongping; Bingner, R. L.; Rebich, Richard A.

doi:10.13031/2013.6448

Cited by 88 publications

(100 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The coefficient of determination and the Nash-Sutcliff efficiency factor achieved after the runoff calibration were good (Table 6). Similar results were found at the event scale by other authors like Yuan et al (2001), Shrestha et al (2006) and Shamshad et al (2008).…”

Section: Calibration and Validationsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…The calibration/validation process of runoff was carried out by modifying the initial values of CN, which represent a key factor in obtaining accurate prediction of runoff and sediment yield (Yuan et al, 2001;Shrestha et al, 2006) and the most important input parameter to which the runoff is sensitive (Yuan et al, 2001;Baginska et al, 2003).…”

Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Runoff and sediment yield modeling in a medium-size mediterranean watershed

Abdelwahab¹,

Bisantino²,

Milillo³

et al. 2013

J Agricult Engineer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The AnnAGNPS model was used to estimate runoff, peak discharge and sediment yield at the event scale in the Carapelle watershed, a Mediterranean medium-size watershed (506 km 2 ) located in Apulia, Southern Italy. The model was calibrated and validated using five years of runoff and sediment yield data measured at a monitoring station located at Ordona -Ponte dei Sauri Bridge. A total of 36 events was used to estimate the output of the model during the period 2007-2011, in comparison to the corresponding observations at the watershed outlet. The model performed well in predicting runoff, as was testified by the high values of the coefficients of efficiency and determination during the validation process. The peak flows predictions were satisfactory especially for the high flow events; the prediction capability of sediment yield was good, even if a slight over-estimation was observed. Finally, the model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of different Management practices (MPs) on the watershed (converting wheat to forest, using vegetated streams, crop rotation corn/soybean, no tillage). While the maximum reduction in sediment yield was achieved converting wheat to forest, the best compromises between soil conservation and agriculture resulted to be crop rotations.

show abstract

Section: Calibration and Validationsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Runoff and sediment yield modeling in a medium-size mediterranean watershed

Abdelwahab¹,

Bisantino²,

Milillo³

et al. 2013

J Agricult Engineer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…AnnAGNPS model has been developed through a partnership between the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Theurer, 2005; United States Departement of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service- Usda-Ars, 2006;Rebich, 2001). AnnAGNPS is a distributed-parameter, continuoussimulation, watershed-scale model and is an expansion of the AGNPS (Young et al, 1989) model, which was originated from the development of the ANSWERS Model (Beasley;Huggins;Monke, 1982;Griffin et al, 1988).…”

Section: Annualized Agricultural Non-point Source (Annagnps)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The AnnAGNPS model Yuan, 2003) has been evaluated for hydrology simulations and water quality prediction worldwide under different land uses and climate conditions (Baginska;Milne-Home;Cornish, 2003;Chahor et al, 2014;Li et al, 2015;Li, 2012;Hua et al, 2012;Licciardello et al, 2007;Parajuli et al, 2009;Polyakov et al, 2007;Shamshad et al, 2008;Shrestha et al, 2006;Taguas et al, 2012;Yuan et al, 2011;Rebich, 2001). Li et al (2015) In tropical conditions, Shamshad et al (2008) applied the AnnAGNPS model for soil loss estimation and nutrient loading for watersheds in Malaysia.…”

Section: Annualized Agricultural Non-point Source (Annagnps)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Agricultural watershed modeling: a review for hydrology and soil erosion processes

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Models have been used by man for thousands of years to control his environment in a favorable way to better human living conditions. The use of hydrologic models has been a widely effective tool in order to support decision makers dealing with watersheds related to several economic and social activities, like public water supply, energy generation, and water availability for agriculture, among others. The purpose of this review is to briefly discuss some models on soil and water movement on landscapes (RUSLE, WEPP, GeoWEPP, LASH, DHSVM and AnnAGNPS) to provide information about them to help and serve in a proper manner in order to discuss particular problems related to hydrology and soil erosion processes. Models have been changed and evaluated significantly in recent years, highlighting the use of remote sense, GIS and automatic calibration process, allowing them capable of simulating watersheds under a given land-use and climate change effects. However, hydrology models have almost the same physical structure, which is not enough for simulating problems related to the long-term effects of different land-uses. That has been our challenge for next future: to understand entirely the hydrology cycle, having as reference the critical zone, in which the hydrological processes act together from canopy to the bottom of aquifers.Index terms: RUSLE; WEPP; GeoWEPP; LASH; DHSVM; AnnAGNPS. RESUMOModelos têm sido usados pelo homem há milhares de anos para controlar seu ambiente de uma maneira favorável para melhores condições de vida para os humanos. O uso de modelos hidrológicos tem sido uma ferramenta muito eficaz para apoiar os decisores que lidam com as bacias hidrográficas para subsidiar diversas atividades econômicas e sociais, como o abastecimento público de água, geração de energia, e a disponibilidade de água para a agricultura, entre outros. Objetivou-se, nesta revisão, discutir brevemente alguns modelos muito aplicados ao estudo do movimento da água e solos em paisagens (RUSLE, WEPP, GeoWEPP, LASH, DHSVM and AnnAGNPS), para fornecer informações sobre os mesmos, para auxiliar no entendimento adequado de problemas específicos relacionados com os processos de hidrologia e erosão do solo. Modelos têm sido alterados e avaliados de forma significativa nos últimos anos, com destaque para o uso de sensoriamento remoto, GIS e processo de calibração automática, permitindo aos mesmos que sejam capazes de simular bacias hidrográficas nas suas condições atuais de uso do solo e mudanças climáticas. No entanto, os modelos hidrológicos têm quase a mesma estrutura física, o que não é suficiente para simular problemas relacionados com os efeitos a longo prazo de diferentes usos do solo. Esse tem sido um dos principais desafios para o futuro: compreender inteiramente o ciclo hidrológico, tendo como referência a zona crítica, na qual os processos hidrológicos agem em conjunto a partir do dossel até a base dos aquíferos.

show abstract

“…AnnAGNPS was calibrated, validated and applied for runoff and sediment yield in different geographic locations, conditions and management practices [5][6][7][8]. The impact of the variation of the most meaningful parameters [R, K, C and P factors of the universal soil loss equation (USLE), curve number (CN) and Manning's roughness coeffi cient (MN)] on the model response was evaluated in several works [9,10]. In semi-arid environments the model has been tested at different spatial and time scales [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling soil erosion and sediment transport under different land management options in a southern-italy watershed

Abuiziah¹,

Bisantino²,

Gentile³

et al. 2013

Int. J. SAFE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to investigate the infl uence of different land management options on the sediment load at the watershed scale. To reach this, the Annualized agricultural non-point source model was used in the Candelaro basin (2300 km 2 ). The watershed is located in a semi-arid area of southern Italy (Puglia region) and is affected by extensive erosion processes on the hillslopes. The sediment transport simulations have been compared with the 15 years (1970)(1971)(1972)(1973)(1974)(1975)(1976)(1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984) data coming from measures taken in two sub-watersheds (Vulgano and Salsola). Later, the model has been applied for a period of 24 years to evaluate the effects of different land management options on the sediment yield: traditional best management practices, environmentally targeted agricultural practices and water and soil conservation works. The results obtained in the fi rst part of the work show that the Annualized agricultural non-point source model performs well in simulating runoff and sediment yields at the watershed scale. Furthermore, the analysis carried out shows that the model is an effi cient tool to assess the infl uence of different management options in the long term and in different weather conditions.

show abstract

Evaluation of Annagnps on Mississippi Delta Msea Watersheds

Cited by 88 publications

References 0 publications

Runoff and sediment yield modeling in a medium-size mediterranean watershed

Runoff and sediment yield modeling in a medium-size mediterranean watershed

Agricultural watershed modeling: a review for hydrology and soil erosion processes

Modelling soil erosion and sediment transport under different land management options in a southern-italy watershed

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About