2023
DOI: 10.3390/dj11060149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of a Bioactive Restorative Material Versus a Glass-Ionomer Cement on Streptococcus Mutans: In-Vitro Study

Giulio Conti,
Federica Veneri,
Francesca Amadori
et al.

Abstract: Background: Dental caries management consists of both preventive and restorative approaches. Pediatric dentists can rely on many techniques and materials to restore decayed teeth, but a high failure rate is still observed, mainly due to secondary caries. New restorative bioactive materials combine the mechanical and aesthetic characteristics of resinous materials with the capability to remineralize and the antimicrobial properties of glass ionomers, thus counteracting the occurrence of secondary caries. The ai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of distribution of variables. Usually, the numerical variables distributed between the treated groups were compared using a two-way ANOVA test (univariate and multivariate analysis so that the variance was obtained for the least significant difference (LSD) , and all data were expressed as a standard deviation (mean ± SD) and the significance of the differences was discovered when... p < 0.05 This experiment was conducted according to [13] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of distribution of variables. Usually, the numerical variables distributed between the treated groups were compared using a two-way ANOVA test (univariate and multivariate analysis so that the variance was obtained for the least significant difference (LSD) , and all data were expressed as a standard deviation (mean ± SD) and the significance of the differences was discovered when... p < 0.05 This experiment was conducted according to [13] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, non-invasive or minimally-invasive approaches have spread widely in many medical and dental fields, especially in pediatric dentistry, with the implementation of more biologic atraumatic techniques [ 10 , 11 ] Modern minimally invasive approaches include selective or stepwise carious removal, also using atraumatic manual techniques along with chemo-mechanical procedures, non-restorative treatments, such as fluoride varnish or silver diamine fluoride applications, and new suitable restorative solutions and materials with bioactive properties [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Overall, these approaches allow more conservative and less time-consuming procedures, requiring less need for anesthetics and causing reduced post-operative discomfort [ 6 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%