2020
DOI: 10.5296/jas.v8i3.17070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Application Frequency and Levels of Nitrogen on Cactus Pear

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic characteristics of Nopalea cochenillifera (L.) Salm-Dick under different frequencies and levels of nitrogen application (N). Three nitrogen fertilizer application frequencies (1 time year-1, 6 times year-1 and 12 times year-1) and four nitrogen levels (0, 100, 200 and 400 kg of N ha-1 year-1) were evaluated one year after the planting, in a randomized blocks design with 12 replications. There was no interaction (P>0.05) between application frequencie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nitrogen fertilization frequency of 30/60 days influenced the agronomic responses of the cactus pear, resulting in higher values for locality 2 (Riacho Frio) regarding the FMP, DMP, WUE, WAC, and CCAP variables (Table 4). Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development (2021) 23: 165-179 The effects observed for the productive variables are possibly due to the effects of nitrogen in increasing the cellular content, potentializing growth and cell multiplication, increasing the WAC and WUE, as already observed in previous studies (Nascimento et al 2020). The highest values found for these variables in Locality 2 can be explained by the influence that the cultivation environment causes on the biomass production of this crop, as described by Edvan et al (2020) in their study with the environmental adequacy of cactus pear varieties.…”
Section: Agronomic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The nitrogen fertilization frequency of 30/60 days influenced the agronomic responses of the cactus pear, resulting in higher values for locality 2 (Riacho Frio) regarding the FMP, DMP, WUE, WAC, and CCAP variables (Table 4). Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development (2021) 23: 165-179 The effects observed for the productive variables are possibly due to the effects of nitrogen in increasing the cellular content, potentializing growth and cell multiplication, increasing the WAC and WUE, as already observed in previous studies (Nascimento et al 2020). The highest values found for these variables in Locality 2 can be explained by the influence that the cultivation environment causes on the biomass production of this crop, as described by Edvan et al (2020) in their study with the environmental adequacy of cactus pear varieties.…”
Section: Agronomic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This fact can be explained by the increase in the number of cladodes due to the greater nitrogen availability. Thus, the higher need for nutrient translocation to new cladodes (drains), influences the characteristics related to the development of the cladodes (Lemaire e Chapman, 1996;Nascimento et al, 2020) The nitrogen doses promoted an increasing linear effect (P<0.01) for the number of cladodes, length, perimeter, height, FMP, DMP, WUE, and CCAP (Table 5). The number of cladodes varied from 6.6 to 8.9±0.4 for the 0 and 400 kg N ha -1 year -1 doses, respectively.…”
Section: Agronomic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among nitrogen fertilizer sources, urea is widely used due to its lower cost, but its use efficiency by the plant is reduced because it is rapidly hydrolysed, increasing the loss of nitrogen through volatilization in the form of ammonia (Skonieski et al, 2017). The cactus pear has shown positive responses to nitrogen fertilizations above 100 kg of N per hectare (Nascimento et al, 2020). Using urea, the efficiency of nitrogen fertilization is inversely proportional to the increase in the nitrogen level, that is, high levels provide low efficiency (Bernardi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%