2004
DOI: 10.1115/1.1637645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Aseismic Reliability of Actual Boiler Structures and a Study on Design of Seismic Ties Based on Proof Tests Using a Large Scaled Shaking Table

Abstract: This paper deals with the evaluation of aseismic reliability of actual boiler plant structures in conjunction with seismic ties, installed between the boiler and the support structures. Proof tests were conducted with a coupled model using a large-scale shake table which verified that the ties acted as energy-absorbing devices against severe earthquakes. Since recent boiler structures are designed based on dynamic response analysis considering the boiler-structure interaction and the effect of energy dissipati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stoppers designed for CFTPPs are not adequate, and experimental researches are even less. Aida et al 24 evaluated the aseismic reliability of actual boiler structures equipped with conventional stoppers, which dissipate energy by material plastic deformations of the stoppers and further conducted proof tests by using a large‐scale shaking table. Some other scholars 25–27 reported a viscous‐damping stopper theoretically, which works in earthquakes with relatively large numbers of cycles compared with the conventional metal stoppers, and found that the viscous‐damping stoppers worked better than the conventional ones in reducing the seismic responses of the CFTPP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stoppers designed for CFTPPs are not adequate, and experimental researches are even less. Aida et al 24 evaluated the aseismic reliability of actual boiler structures equipped with conventional stoppers, which dissipate energy by material plastic deformations of the stoppers and further conducted proof tests by using a large‐scale shaking table. Some other scholars 25–27 reported a viscous‐damping stopper theoretically, which works in earthquakes with relatively large numbers of cycles compared with the conventional metal stoppers, and found that the viscous‐damping stoppers worked better than the conventional ones in reducing the seismic responses of the CFTPP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%