1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02353358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of auditory discrimination in children with ADD and without ADD

Abstract: Auditory discrimination abilities of children with and without attention deficits were investigated to measure the variability due to different response modes (verbal [NU-6] and picture pointing [GFW]) and competing messages (GFW). Results showed no differences between response modes in quiet, but significant differences in noise between groups with children having ADD showing poorer speech discrimination. Additionally, differential effects between types of competing messages for the same task were not found i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
25
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Zeigler et al (2005) report that whilst children with language impairment perform as well as a younger language-matched control group on a speech discrimination task in optimal listening conditions, they performed significantly less well in background noise. Similar findings are reported for children with difficulties with literacy and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Bradlow et al, 2003;Geffner et al, 1996). The speech discrimination difficulties of children with a history of otitis media with effusion may also only be observable in background noise conditions (Schilder et al, 1994).…”
Section: Sumariosupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For example, Zeigler et al (2005) report that whilst children with language impairment perform as well as a younger language-matched control group on a speech discrimination task in optimal listening conditions, they performed significantly less well in background noise. Similar findings are reported for children with difficulties with literacy and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Bradlow et al, 2003;Geffner et al, 1996). The speech discrimination difficulties of children with a history of otitis media with effusion may also only be observable in background noise conditions (Schilder et al, 1994).…”
Section: Sumariosupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Similarly, behavioral research supports the notion that phonologic processing skills are fundamental to language development and to subsequent reading abilities (Brady 1991; Catts et al 1999; Wagner et al 1994). Others demonstrated a connection between auditory processing and attention deficits (Geffner et al 1996) or learning disabilities (Kraus et al 1996). Together, these findings highlight the importance of proper auditory processing and speech discrimination for overall cognitive development and functioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A four-alternative, picture-pointing task was used because of its documented success with young children ͑Goldman et al., 1976;Geffner et al, 1996͒ and its obvious advantages over word-generation tasks ͑Elliott et al, 1979͒. Target words were presented in a low-context carrier phrase ͑''Touch the X''͒ because of the present focus on perceptual, or bottomup, factors and the reported advantage of sentential contexts over words presented in isolation ͑Craig, 1988͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%