Evaluation of Auditory Stream Segregation in Musicians and Nonmusicians

Abstract

Introduction One of the major cues that help in auditory stream segregation is spectral profiling. Musicians are trained to perceive a fine structural variation in the acoustic stimuli and have enhanced temporal perception and speech perception in noise. Objective To analyze the differences in spectral profile thresholds in musicians and nonmusicians. Methods The spectral profile analysis threshold was compared between 2 groups (musicians and nonmusicians) in the age range between 15 and 30 years old. The stimuli had 5 harmonics, all at the same amplitude (f0 = 330 Hz, mi4). The third (variable tone) has a similar harmonic structure; however, the amplitude of the third harmonic component was higher, producing a different timbre in comparison with the standards. The subject had to identify the odd timbre tone. The testing was performed at 60 dB HL in a sound-treated room. Results The results of the study showed that the profile analysis thresholds were significantly better in musicians compared with nonmusicians. The result of the study also showed that the profile analysis thresholds were better with an increase in the duration of music training. Thus, improved auditory processing in musicians could have resulted in a better profile analysis threshold. Conclusions Auditory stream segregation was found to be better in musicians compared with nonmusicians, and the performance improved with an increase in several years of training. However, further studies are essential on a larger group with more variables for validation of the results.

Differential advantages of musical backgrounds on binaural integration and interaction skills in instrumentalists, vocalists, and non-musicians

“…In support to the literature on binaural processing ( Johnson et al., 2021 ; Luiz et al., 2021 ; Parbery-Clark et al., 2013 ), the findings of the current study also showed an binaural processing advantage in both the musical groups (vocalists and instrumentalists), who outperformed their non-musician conterparts ( Fig. 2 a and b).…”

Beyond the musician vs. non-musician dichotomy: A focus on amateur musicians suggests that music learning induces a sequential reconfiguration of perceptual auditory organization

“…Several studies have focused on the processes involved to split a sequence into two or several streams (van Noorden, 1975), often addressing the question of auditory perceptual organization expressed along the frequency dimension -albeit necessarily involving time. Results showed that musicians develop an enhanced ability to process distinct streams out of a sound mixture, consistent with their daily experience in extracting melodies out of an orchestral background, which is one of the most complex function of the auditory system (Zendel and Alain, 2009;Johnson et al, 2021). The interleaved melody recognition task (IMRT), which involves a probe melody compared with a mixed sequence composed of a target melody, identical to the probe melody, or a modified version, interleaved with distractor tones, is an objective and indirect measure of auditory streaming proposed by Dowling (1973).…”

Familiarity of Background Music Modulates the Cortical Tracking of Target Speech at the Cocktail Party

“…Several studies have showed that more familiar music facilitates concurrent linguistic tasks by increasing arousal (Weiss et al, 2016) and generating expectancies (Bendixen, 2014; Russo & Pichora-Fuller, 2008). Musical ability is associated not only with speech-in-noise processing advantages (Hennessy et al, 2022; Mankel & Bidelman, 2018; Yoo & Bidelman, 2019), but also parsing complex auditory scenes (Johnson et al, 2021; Zendel & Alain, 2009). Indeed, there is some evidence that trained musicians also more successfully deploy attention in auditory and even non-auditory perceptual tasks (Bialystok & DePape, 2009; Román-Caballero et al, 2020; Yoo & Bidelman, 2019), including those related to cocktail party listening (Bidelman & Yoo, 2020).…”