2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2018.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of automated loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) for routine malaria detection in blood samples of German travelers – A cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
40
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…None of these signals could be confirmed by any other applied diagnostic approach and no additional materials were available from these patients. However, the more extensive molecular testing in this study slightly decreased the calculated sensitivity to 96.4% (239/248) in comparison with 98.7% from the previous assessment [5]. The missed samples were from patients positive for P. falciparum (n = 7) who had already become negative by microscopy under therapy as well as for P. ovale (n = 1) and P. vivax (n = 1) with only a few parasites within the whole thick blood film each.…”
Section: Brief Summarycontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…None of these signals could be confirmed by any other applied diagnostic approach and no additional materials were available from these patients. However, the more extensive molecular testing in this study slightly decreased the calculated sensitivity to 96.4% (239/248) in comparison with 98.7% from the previous assessment [5]. The missed samples were from patients positive for P. falciparum (n = 7) who had already become negative by microscopy under therapy as well as for P. ovale (n = 1) and P. vivax (n = 1) with only a few parasites within the whole thick blood film each.…”
Section: Brief Summarycontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Focusing on genus-specific Meridian illumigene/ alethia Malaria LAMP, the assessment confirmed three presumably falsely positive signals as it had already been described previously [5], confirming a specificity of 99.6% (769/772). None of these signals could be confirmed by any other applied diagnostic approach and no additional materials were available from these patients.…”
Section: Brief Summarysupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Blood counts were performed the same day using the Sysmex XP-300 automated hematology analyzer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). For PCR analyses EDTA-anticoagulated blood was centrifuged and the pellet was Hamburg, Germany) as described before [10,11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%