2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1428-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of behavior and neuropeptide markers of pain in a simple, sciatic nerve-pinch pain model in rats

Abstract: Pathomechanisms of injured-nerve pain have not been fully elucidated. Radicular pain and chronic constriction injury models have been established; however, producing these models is complicated. A sciatic nervepinch injury is easy to produce but the reliability of this model for evaluating pain behavior has not been examined. The current study evaluated pain-related behavior and change in pain markers in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) of rats in a simple, sciatic nerve-pinch injury model. In the model, the sci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4B right), as compared to that in sham-operated rats. This decreased and unchanged percentages of MrgC + neurons in IB4 and CGRP subpopulations of uninjured DRG neurons, respectively, may be due to phenotypic changes and increased expression of these markers in uninjured DRG after nerve injury (Hammond et al, 2004; Chao et al, 2008; Hirose et al, 2010; Nitzan-Luques et al, 2013). The IB4 signal was nearly completely lost, and the CGRP immunoreactivity was very weak and diffusive in the ipsilateral injured L5 DRG; hence their colocalization with MrgC could not be reliably determined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4B right), as compared to that in sham-operated rats. This decreased and unchanged percentages of MrgC + neurons in IB4 and CGRP subpopulations of uninjured DRG neurons, respectively, may be due to phenotypic changes and increased expression of these markers in uninjured DRG after nerve injury (Hammond et al, 2004; Chao et al, 2008; Hirose et al, 2010; Nitzan-Luques et al, 2013). The IB4 signal was nearly completely lost, and the CGRP immunoreactivity was very weak and diffusive in the ipsilateral injured L5 DRG; hence their colocalization with MrgC could not be reliably determined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Phenotypic changes in DRG neurons have been observed after inflammation and peripheral nerve injury (Xiao et al, 2002; Chao et al, 2008; Pernia-Andrade et al, 2009). Since nerve injury may change CGRP expression and IB4 binding in DRG neurons, and these changes are also different in injured and uninjured levels (Hammond et al, 2004; Chao et al, 2008; Hirose et al, 2010; Nitzan-Luques et al, 2013), a triple-immunofluorescence staining study is needed to determine the relative proportion and differential changes of MrgC expression in different subsets of DRG neurons after nerve injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CGRP expression is known to be reduced in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons following nerve transection (Noguchi et al ., ; Nahin et al ., ). In contrast, the number of CGRP‐immunoreactive (IR) neurons is increased with peripheral inflammation (Ohtori et al ., ) or nerve crush in the DRG (Hirose et al ., ), and CGRP is also expressed in large DRG neurons after chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve (Miki et al ., ; Ohtori et al ., ). These results suggest that CGRP in primary afferent neurons is involved in modulation of excitability of DRG neurons associated with peripheral nerve injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ATF-3 is a member of the ATF/CREB transcription factor superfamily, and indicates stresses in DRG neurons after peripheral axonal injury or nonneural tissues following cellular destruction (51)(52)(53). ATF-3 was also suggested to E281 PRF Selectively Suppresses C-Fiber-Mediated Neuropathic Pain be involved in nociceptive development (54). Because the active zone of PRF was limited to a narrow range adjacent to the electrode tip (7,8,11), the severely affected tissue is theoretically the region in close contact with the electrode.…”
Section: Prf Does Not Lead To Neuronal Stress In the Drgmentioning
confidence: 99%