2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83719-8_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Behavior of the Joint Between Two Concrete Layers During Splitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, the equivalent splitting tensile strength up to a crack width of 0.2 mm (f0,2) is most used to calculate the resistance of concrete to crack propagation, and equation ( 1) takes the following form [21]:…”
Section: Methods For Determining the Resistance To Crack Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the equivalent splitting tensile strength up to a crack width of 0.2 mm (f0,2) is most used to calculate the resistance of concrete to crack propagation, and equation ( 1) takes the following form [21]:…”
Section: Methods For Determining the Resistance To Crack Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several tests available to evaluate the behavior and/or the strength of overlay-to-substrate interfaces. These tests can be classi ed into three categories according to the stress resultant at the interface 1) axial, includes; Pull-off (Long and Murray, 1984;Delatte et al, 2000), Direct Tension (Ohama et al, 1986), and Split-Tensile test (Sustersic and Zajc, 1999;Tschegg et al, 2000), 2) bending, includes exural test (Wall et al, 1986;Abu-Tair et al, 1996;Kunieda et al, 2000;Kamada and Li, 2000), and 3) shear, includes testing by; Direct Shear (Chen et al, 1995;Li et al, 1997), Slant-Shear (Tayeh et al, 2013;Pattnaik, 2015), Bi-surface shear, and Push-off (Hofbeck et al, 1969;Mattock, 1974;Crane, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%