2018
DOI: 10.1177/014556131809701211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Bendable Surgical Suction Devices Made of Shape-Memory Alloy for the Endonasal Transsphenoid Removal of Pituitary Tumors

Abstract: In minimally invasive surgeries, it can be difficult to reach desired anatomic areas with rigid instruments, especially when obstacles are present in the surgical corridor (e.g., during transnasal pituitary surgery). We developed a new kind of suction device constructed of the shape-memory alloy Nitinol (nickel titanium), which is adaptable to a patient's specific anatomy. Use of this device minimizes surgical risks by allowing physicians to use an endonasal transsphenoid approach. The suction device, which is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, only 7 out of 62 studies report outcomes or comments relating to the ergonomics of the instrument ( Supplementary Table S3 ). Comment on instrument ergonomics featured in six studies of six instruments: the Suction Device made of Shape Memory Alloy connected to the ATOM5 Record 55 DDS [ 68 ], the Malleable Endoscope Suction Instrument [ 34 ], the Monoshaft Bipolar Cautery [ 42 ], the Bipolar Microscissors [ 17 ], the Sonopet Ultrasonic Bone Aspirator [ 66 ] and the Handpiece, Keyhold and Needle-Type Probes and Probe Sheaths for use with the Ultrasonic Surgical Unit [ 31 ]. One study reported administering a seven-question survey in which surgeons rated the ergonomics of the final instrument design as “very good” [ 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, only 7 out of 62 studies report outcomes or comments relating to the ergonomics of the instrument ( Supplementary Table S3 ). Comment on instrument ergonomics featured in six studies of six instruments: the Suction Device made of Shape Memory Alloy connected to the ATOM5 Record 55 DDS [ 68 ], the Malleable Endoscope Suction Instrument [ 34 ], the Monoshaft Bipolar Cautery [ 42 ], the Bipolar Microscissors [ 17 ], the Sonopet Ultrasonic Bone Aspirator [ 66 ] and the Handpiece, Keyhold and Needle-Type Probes and Probe Sheaths for use with the Ultrasonic Surgical Unit [ 31 ]. One study reported administering a seven-question survey in which surgeons rated the ergonomics of the final instrument design as “very good” [ 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous work, the ergonomic design was evaluated by an experienced skull base neurosurgeon. 19 The handpiece was combined with a cuboid tracker. A special colored test pattern FIG.…”
Section: Mixed Reality Hololens Navigation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous work, the ergonomic design was already evaluated by an experienced skull base neurosurgeon. 18 The handpiece was combined with a cuboid tracker. A special-colored test pattern was placed on each cuboid surface so that the instrument could be recognized by the sensors of the Hololens 2 (Figure 2).…”
Section: Surgical Pointer Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%