2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of bite force recovery in patients with maxillofacial fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
0
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
0
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the postoperative process, 2 weeks after mandibular fracture reposition, bite force has been experimentally found to be in the range of 35–65 N ( Gheibollahi et al, 2021 ), which is in accordance with the findings of the present study. Previous studies investigating fibula free flap using FE models have reported bite forces of 150 N, according to long-term postoperative outcomes described in the literature ( Curtis et al, 1997 ; Atik et al, 2016 ; Sakuraba et al, 2017 ; Kucukguven and Akkocaoğlu, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the postoperative process, 2 weeks after mandibular fracture reposition, bite force has been experimentally found to be in the range of 35–65 N ( Gheibollahi et al, 2021 ), which is in accordance with the findings of the present study. Previous studies investigating fibula free flap using FE models have reported bite forces of 150 N, according to long-term postoperative outcomes described in the literature ( Curtis et al, 1997 ; Atik et al, 2016 ; Sakuraba et al, 2017 ; Kucukguven and Akkocaoğlu, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A reduction of total maximum muscle forces to 12.5% was assumed. This resulted in a biting force of 45 N which is in agreement with reported values post-surgery ( Gheibollahi et al, 2021 ). Maximum muscle forces in the healthy and postoperative scenario, fiber directions, and fiber activation are shown in Table 1 .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Essa medida também é recomendada para avaliação da consolidação óssea (Ahmed et al, 2016). Um estudo mencionou que a vantagem de avaliar a FMM em vários períodos permitiu a determinação de um período de controle ótimo (Gheibollahi et al, 2021). Embora tenha uma recuperação funcional em 2 meses de PO (Pepato et al, 2014) e encontramos um aumento significativo até o período de 2 meses, prolongar o controle PO até 3 meses seria recomendável quanto ao acompanhamento dos pacientes com fratura de mandíbula e a recuperação da FMM (Zaky et al, 2020;Gheibollahi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Alguns autores utilizam sua medição em regiões de molares direita e esquerda, além das regiões de incisivos (Kumar et al, 2013;Rastogi et al, 2016). Desai e Jain (2019) realizam sua medida em incisivos, caninos e molares e, por outro lado, Gheibollahi et al (2021) optaram por realizar sua aferição apenas nos incisivos. Entretanto, na região de molares exerce a maior geração de força de mordida (Salunkhe et al, 2022).…”
Section: Força De Mordida E Performance Mastigatóriaunclassified