2018
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Bluestar® Forensic Magnum and Other Traditional Blood Detection Methods on Bloodstained Wood Subjected to a Variety of Burn Conditions,

Abstract: Accurate blood detection is a primary concern for forensic scientists, especially in highly compromised situations. In this study, blood was added to wood blocks and subjected to a variety of fire treatments: the absence or presence of accelerant, burn time (1, 3, or 5 min), and extinguishment method (smothering or dousing with water). Burned blocks were given a qualitative burn score, followed by removal of half of the char from each block and subsequent testing of each half for blood using luminol (13% posit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Burnt blood stains could not be identified by phenolphthalein test in the current study due to complete charring of the stain. This is in accordance with the results of Vineyard et al (32). This could be explained as high temperature causes oxidation of Fe + 2 to Fe + 3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Burnt blood stains could not be identified by phenolphthalein test in the current study due to complete charring of the stain. This is in accordance with the results of Vineyard et al (32). This could be explained as high temperature causes oxidation of Fe + 2 to Fe + 3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In an experiment carried out by Vineyard A et al, 38 different blood detection reagents were used to identify blood samples subject to different variables associated with arson scenes. 38 Wood blocks were used with different blood dilutions applied, different extinguishment methods were carried out including smothering and covering with water. Unleaded gasoline was added to half the samples to see how accelerant would impact detection methods.…”
Section: Dna Recovery Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive blood results from porous combustible surface is more likely to be successful using Luminol or Bluestar. Vineyard A et al, 38 concluded that even though the porous surface was exposed to the fire for only one-minute, presumptive tests are not sensitive enough to detect DNA samples on charred items. Most laboratories require a positive DNA test before considering the sample for DNA profiling, which may need to be reconsidered in arson scenes where too many variables render presumptive tests inadequate.…”
Section: Dna Recovery Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemical reagents [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and infrared photography [10][11][12][13] are both commonly used for visualization enhancement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%