1994
DOI: 10.1071/ar9940783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Bos indicus and Bos taurus straightbreds and crosses. I. Post-weaning growth of steers in different environments

Abstract: Post-weaning growth of 186 steers comprizing straightbred Hereford (H x H) and Brahman (B x B), first-cross (B x H) and back-cross (H x BH and B x BH) was evaluated. The steers had been raised to weaning (8 months of age) by dams which grazed either high, medium or low quality pasture (pre-weaning pasture system) at Grafton, N.S.W. The steers were grown on pasture from time of weaning in one of three locations in New South Wales representing subtropical, temperate-good, and temperate-good to poor environments,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genotype · environment interactions commonly occur when breeds or breed-crosses are compared across variable environments (Thompson et al 1981;Darnell et al 1987;Arthur et al 1994), and in our study, they were indicated by the presence of significant genotype · cohort effects. The cohort mean level for a trait was taken as the measure of environment Estimates differed for Brahman and Tropical Composite; see Table 10 for genotype-specific estimates.…”
Section: Evidence For Genotype · Environment Interactionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Genotype · environment interactions commonly occur when breeds or breed-crosses are compared across variable environments (Thompson et al 1981;Darnell et al 1987;Arthur et al 1994), and in our study, they were indicated by the presence of significant genotype · cohort effects. The cohort mean level for a trait was taken as the measure of environment Estimates differed for Brahman and Tropical Composite; see Table 10 for genotype-specific estimates.…”
Section: Evidence For Genotype · Environment Interactionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Indeed, forage-based diets are known to decrease C18 :2 proportions in fat when compared with concentrate diets (Marmer et al, 1984). The high concentration of C18:3 in grass itself (Butler and Bailey, 1973) must be also implicated in this phenomenon (Dawson and Steen, 1997). This stemmed probably from the higher leaness of meat, leading to higher proportion of unsaturated lipid membranes in total meat fat (Leat, 1983), as suggested in Figure 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%