2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2005.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of boundary conditions used to model dilute, turbulent gas/solids flows in a pipe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
85
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, Almuttahar et al [9] confirmed the predictions of [8] in 2D simulations of a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) by showing that using a free slip boundary condition, the near-wall solids volume fraction was in better agreement with experimental data. In their parametric study, they used only four values for φ, namely 0, 0.1, 0.5 and 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, Almuttahar et al [9] confirmed the predictions of [8] in 2D simulations of a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) by showing that using a free slip boundary condition, the near-wall solids volume fraction was in better agreement with experimental data. In their parametric study, they used only four values for φ, namely 0, 0.1, 0.5 and 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Benyahia et al [8] conducted 2D axisymmetric simulations of dilute turbulent gas-solid flow in a cylinder and showed that values of φ close to 0 were preferred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Altantzis et al [31] recently showed that for a thin rectangular bed, the choice of φ may even alter the fluidization regime; slug formation being characteristic to lower values of φ. In general, it has been determined that low values (∼ 10 −4 − 10 −3 ) are suitable for circulating beds [32,33] while higher values (∼ 0.05-0.5) are appropriate for bubbling beds [15][16][17]30]. This suggests that the choice of φ is dependent on the flow and particle-wall collision properties and may not be universally applicable [1,15,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specularity coefficient is an empirical parameter describing the particle-wall collisions. Its value has a range from zero for perfect specular collision to unity for perfect diffuse collision [42] . A smaller value generally represents a smooth wall with less friction.…”
Section: Simulation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%