2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10765-017-2350-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Building Energy Saving Through the Development of Venetian Blinds’ Optimal Control Algorithm According to the Orientation and Window-to-Wall Ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another factor to be simulated is solar radiation. Adjusting the angle of fac xade panels or deploying shading devices can reduce the amount of direct sunlight entering the building (Kwon et al, 2018), thereby minimizing heat gain (Bui et al, 2020). Effective facade coverage can substantially lower heating costs in winter and cooling costs in summer.…”
Section: Performance Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor to be simulated is solar radiation. Adjusting the angle of fac xade panels or deploying shading devices can reduce the amount of direct sunlight entering the building (Kwon et al, 2018), thereby minimizing heat gain (Bui et al, 2020). Effective facade coverage can substantially lower heating costs in winter and cooling costs in summer.…”
Section: Performance Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there is an increasing number of studies proposing optimisation approaches to improve energy efficiency, cost performance, thermal comfort and daylight performance, as a single or multi-objective optimisation. The single optimisation approaches focus mostly on energy performance to find the optimum building shape, facade (Li et al, 2018; Tuhus-Dubrow and Krarti, 2010), window types (Lee et al, 2013), window orientation and window-to-wall ratio (WWR) (Susorova et al, 2013) and building orientation (Kwon et al, 2018). Second, the life-cycle cost has been considered as the single objective to optimise, in addition to infiltration (Ferdyn-Grygierek and Grygierek, 2017) and insulation thickness and layers of the envelope (Axaopoulos et al, 2019; Ferdyn-Grygierek and Grygierek, 2017; Kumar et al, 2020; Meng et al, 2019; Yılmaz and Oral, 2018, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This climate classification makes it possible to generalize the results of CBDM since regions in the classifications include almost similar climate conditions. Most previous multi-objective optimization studies rely on energy optimization of buildings which depends significantly on occupants behavior [10], shading devices and slate angles [11], building envelope and orientation [12,13], and the type of windows [14] based on the Window-to-Wall Ratio (WWR) instead of WFR. It is noteworthy to mention that the acceptable range of WWR is 40% according to the ASHRAE 90.1 standard for some specific climate zones [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%