1960
DOI: 10.2172/4816066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Buried Conduits as Personnel Shelters

Abstract: welve large-diameter bur' d conduit sections of various shapes were tested in th 60-to-149d p s i overpressure region o h b P r i s c i l l a to make an empiricai determination of the degree of personnel protection afford d by commercially available steel and concrete conduits a t depths of burial of 5, 7.5, and 10 feet below grade. Essentially, it was desired to assure that Departmgnt of Defense Class I (100-psi and comparable radiations) and Class I1 (50-psi and comparable radiations) protection is afforded … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The consequence of this is that our main fall off occurs [1][2] feet later than in the experiment. We believe here also that at least pert of the explanation for this effect results from a centerline approach vs an approach by lateral averaging.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With Some Classic Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The consequence of this is that our main fall off occurs [1][2] feet later than in the experiment. We believe here also that at least pert of the explanation for this effect results from a centerline approach vs an approach by lateral averaging.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With Some Classic Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…+2 . *CRRNTO ( IC , VELO ( IC , 1 ) =RMTX(1,1) *RVCT ( 1 ) *ESC ( 1 ) *ECCO DO 31 J=2 , 21 VELO ( IC , J ) =RMTX ( J, J) *RVCT ( J ) *ESC ( 1 ) *ECCO VELP ( IC , J) =0 . IP=J-1 DO 30 1=1, IP 30 VELP ( IC , J) =VELP ( IC .…”
unclassified
“…For comparison purposes, the relevant experimental data are collected from various declassified atmospheric nuclear-test reports, and a summary of all compiled data is given in Table 1. The data belong to (1) Operation Hardtack (Swift et al 1958), (2) Operation Plumbbob (Flathau et al 1959;Albright et al 1960;Bowen et al 1960;Bultmann et al 1960;Deeds et al 1960;Swift et al 1960;Perret 1960;Albright et al 1961;Bryant and Keefer 1962), (3) Operation Redwing (Perret 1956;Kingery et al 1960), (4) Operation…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Records: Air-blast Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%