“…Several works have dealt with techno-economic aspects of the calcium looping process, and very early it was anticipated that it could have significant advantages over the amine-based process with regard to the price per ton of CO 2 captured (<20 USD t CO 2 –1 , which was less than half of the costs for an amine-based CO 2 capture process; note that correcting for inflation this is ∼26 USD t CO 2 –1 in 2021). − The sensitivity toward the cost of the sorbent for CO 2 capture and its rate of deactivation was relatively high in these early analyses, and indeed synthetic sorbents were predicted not to be competitive with natural limestone unless their long-term stability is significantly better under realistic process conditions. , Interestingly, although most of the literature has dealt with the development of novel, synthetic sorbents, estimates of the production costs are scarce and thus make it difficult to assess their suitability for a large-scale CO 2 capture process on economic grounds. Often sorbent costs had to be estimated based on values published decades ago. , Recently, many studies have utilized industrial waste products rich in species that are typically used to stabilize the CaO in a sorbent, e.g., Mg, Al, or Si, ,− or bioderived materials ,− to reduce the costs of sorbent production; a recent overview on sorbents based on waste products, covering also low-temperature adsorbents, has been given by Wang et al . Questions related to the recycling and reuse of spent sorbents or their processing (e.g., the separation of the inert phases and the Ca phase) have not been addressed in detail and thus offer potential for research (as, for example, in refs and in the context of chemical looping).…”