Evaluation of calcium sulphate barrier to collagen membrane in intrabony defects

Budhiraja, Shilpa; Bhavsar, Neeta; Kumar, Santosh; Desai, Khushboo; Duseja, Sareen

doi:10.5051/jpis.2012.42.6.237

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results are also similar to an animal study conducted by El-Dien et al [ 53 ], in which bilateral defects were arbitrarily treated with DFDBA + platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (test) or DFDBA alone (control). The bone fill at site 2 (DFDBA) was 4.6 ± 1.07 mm at six months, which is in line with previous studies [ 45 , 46 , 48 - 50 , 54 ].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Versus Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in the Treatment of Periodontal Disease: A Clinical and Radiographical Evaluation

Kumar¹,

Desai²,

Joshi³

et al. 2022

Cureus

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim The study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate the effect of biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in treating periodontal disease. Method The study consisted of 44 patients. The sites were randomly assigned to receive one of two treatment modalities (BCP at site 1 and demineralized freeze-dried bone at site 2) by a computerized method. All the clinical data were measured with the help of a University of North Carolina-15 (UNC-15) probe at the baseline, three months, and six months postoperatively. Radiovisiographs were taken using a Rinn XCP® (Dentsply/Rinn Corp, Elgin, IL) system and an oral grid using the paralleling technique. A manual calculation of the defect area was undertaken at the end of six months and was compared with the other groups. Result The linear bone growth recorded for site 1 at the end of six months was 3.8 ± 1.14 mm, and site 2 was 4.6 ± 1.07 mm. The intergroup comparison showed more remarkable linear bone growth in site 2, which was statistically insignificant, with a mean difference of 0.8 ± 1.23 mm and a p -value of 0.07. Conclusion Improvements were observed on all the documented parameters. However, the sites treated with DFDBA showed better periodontal regeneration.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Versus Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in the Treatment of Periodontal Disease: A Clinical and Radiographical Evaluation

Kumar¹,

Desai²,

Joshi³

et al. 2022

Cureus

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Budhiraja showed parallel results when Demineralization Freeze Dried Bone Allograft (DFBBA) and collagen membrane was compared with DFDBA and Calcium Sulphate (CS) indicating that CS is effective as a collagen membrane as a barrier material. [ 44 ]…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomimetic ceramics for periodontal regeneration in infrabony defects: A systematic review

Jagdish

Thanveer

2014

J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biomimetic materials are widely used in the treatment of osseous defects as an alternative to autogenous bone graft. The aim of this article was to review the literature and compare the quality of published articles on biomimetic ceramic material used for periodontal regeneration in the treatment of infrabony defects and to discuss the future direction of research. The bibliographic databases PubMed, Ebsco, and Google Scholar were searched from January 2000 to March 2014 for randomized control trials in which biomimetic ceramic graft material was compared with open flap debridement or in combination with any other regenerative material. To avoid the variability of the search terms, the thesaurus Mesh was used. The primary outcome variable assessed was clinical attachment level (CAL). The screening of eligible studies, assessment of the methodological quality of the trials, and data extraction were performed by two observers independently. Twenty-six articles were identified and included in this systematic review. The primary outcome was CAL. Out of the 26 studies, 24 showed more than 2 mm of CAL gain. The difference in CAL change between test and control groups varied from 1.2 mm to 5.88 mm with respect to different biomaterials/biomimetic materials, which was clinically and statistically significant. Meta-analysis was not done due to heterogeneity in results between studies. Overall, biomaterials were found to be more effective than open flap debridement in improving the attachment levels in intraosseous defects. Future research should aim at increasing the osteoinductive capacity of these biomimetic graft materials.

show abstract

“…CS easily adapts and adheres to the root surface, including root concavities [20]. In addition, CS is readily available, it can be easily sterilized, inexpensive (economic alternative to collagen), completely resorbable, and biocompatible, and in the presence of bone and periosteum, it becomes osteogenic [21]. No specific disadvantages have been found when this material was used.…”

Section: Calcium Sulphatementioning

confidence: 99%

Biomaterials for Periodontal Regeneration: A Comprehensive Discussion of its Merits and Demerits

2018

J Dent Maxillofacial Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Treatment of periodontal diseases is becoming more prevalent and one of the treatment methods is to regenerate periodontal tissues. Over the period many biomaterials have been developed many of which are currently being used and more research is still in progress. Such a range of biomaterials choice makes it a challenging ordeal for Dentists to weigh the pros and cons of the popular biomaterials. This manuscript attempts to be a comprehensive document that discusses the merits and demerits of various biomaterials to aid in the decision making of biomaterial choice for periodontal disease treatments.

show abstract

Evaluation of calcium sulphate barrier to collagen membrane in intrabony defects

Cited by 11 publications

References 18 publications

Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Versus Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in the Treatment of Periodontal Disease: A Clinical and Radiographical Evaluation

Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Versus Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in the Treatment of Periodontal Disease: A Clinical and Radiographical Evaluation

Biomimetic ceramics for periodontal regeneration in infrabony defects: A systematic review

Biomaterials for Periodontal Regeneration: A Comprehensive Discussion of its Merits and Demerits

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About