2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.06.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of capsule endoscopy in active, mild-to-moderate, overt, obscure GI bleeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
55
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, implementation of an aggressive management to detect and treat the underlying bleeding lesion is encouraged. This finding was also supported by other studies (19,34,48,49). In the Ribeiro et al study (27), more than half of patients with positive VCE received specific treatment, thus decreasing the rebleeding risk.…”
Section: Impact On Subsequent Therapeutic Strategies and Clinical Outsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Thus, implementation of an aggressive management to detect and treat the underlying bleeding lesion is encouraged. This finding was also supported by other studies (19,34,48,49). In the Ribeiro et al study (27), more than half of patients with positive VCE received specific treatment, thus decreasing the rebleeding risk.…”
Section: Impact On Subsequent Therapeutic Strategies and Clinical Outsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…CE enables direct visualisation of the small bowel mucosa and has a high sensitivity for detecting flat lesions, such as angiodysplasias, ulcers and arteriovenous malformations which are not easily detectable on radiological modalities [15] . The reported diagnostic yield in literature ranges from 58.4% to 86.8% [9,14,[16][17][18][19][20][21] . The wide range is attributable to different definitions of a positive finding on CE.…”
Section: Capsule Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, CECR are variable and lower than what we note in our study. In a prospective European study of only mild to moderate obscure overt GI bleeders, incomplete IP CEs were 21.6%, but in 75% of the incomplete exams there was some localization of the bleed site [9] . However, this study excluded all severe bleeders and inpatients with other indications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%