2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of cathode contamination with Ca2+ in proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 and showed the IEC of the contaminated CCM is decreased by 58% compared to the as-received CCM as calcium cations replaced protons in the electrolyte. This is in agreement with the results presented by Qi et al 45 who measured the Ca 2+ exchange isotherms (cation uptake) for Nafion membranes soaked in cation solutions.…”
Section: Cell Testingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…24 and showed the IEC of the contaminated CCM is decreased by 58% compared to the as-received CCM as calcium cations replaced protons in the electrolyte. This is in agreement with the results presented by Qi et al 45 who measured the Ca 2+ exchange isotherms (cation uptake) for Nafion membranes soaked in cation solutions.…”
Section: Cell Testingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It is expected that cation contaminants would have an even more pronounced effect on O 2 mass transfer because the O 2 permeability in ionomers is significantly diminished. , In contrast, the impact of organic contaminants on O 2 permeability in ionomers remains to be demonstrated and is expected because other ionomer properties are modified such as ionic conductivity …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such technique for investigation of electrochemical kinetics, performance and durability of PEFC catalysts is testing using a rotating disk electrode (2,3). Among the topics in the literature, RDE analysis has been used to analyze oxygen reduction reaction kinetics (4,5), alternative non-PGM catalyst activity (6)(7)(8)(9), and catalyst response to contamination (10,11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%