Evaluation of Certain Insecticides against Diamondback Moth (DBM) Plutella xylostella on Cauliflower

Harika, G.; Dhurua, S.; Suresh, M.; Sreesandhya, N.

doi:10.23910/ijbsm/2019.10.1.1940

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar findings were made" by Rahimgul and Sasya [4], and Stanikzi and Thakur [5]. Flubendiamide 20% WG (0.934) is found to be the next best treatment which is in line with the findings of Sharma et al, [6], Harika et al, [7] and Maity et al, [8] reported that Flubendiamide 20% WG (0.934) was found most effective in reducing the larval population of Diamondback moth as well as increasing the yield. Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1.223) is found to be the next best treatment which is in line with the findings of Yadav et al, [9].…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 89%

Efficacy of Certain Insecticides and Biopesticides against Dimondback Moth Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) on Cabbage, Brassica oleracea (Linnaeus)

Vaishnavi

Tayde

2022

IJPSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A field experiment was conducted in the Rabi season of 2021 at Central research farm (CRF), Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India. The experiment was laid in Randomised Block Design (RBD) with eight treatments each replicated thrice using a Golden acer. The treatments were Spinosad 45SC, Flubendiamide 20% WG, Bacillus thuringiensis 0.5% WP, Indoxacarb 14.5SC, Neem oil, Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (1X108 CFU/gm), Azadirachtin 0.03%EC and untreated Control. The data on the mean larval population of the first spray and second spray, overall mean revealed that all the treatments except untreated control are effective and at par. Among all the treatments, the least larval population of Diamondback moth was recorded in Spinosad 45SC (0.800) followed by Flubendiamide 20% WG (0.934), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1.223), and Neem oil (1.667), Azadirachtin 0.03%EC (1.811) which was followed by Bacillus thuringiensis 0.5% WP (2.156), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (2.211) was the least effective among all treatments. While the highest yield 302 q/ha was obtained from the treatment Spinosad 45SC. It was followed by Flubendiamide 20% WG (270 q/ha) and Indoxacarb 14.5SC (256 q/ha). When the cost-benefit ratio was worked out, an interesting result was achieved. Among the treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Flubendiamide 20% WG (1:6.12) followed by Spinosad 45SC (1:5.89), Indoxacarb 14.5SC (1:5.16), Neem oil (1:5.00), Azadirachtin 0.03%EC (1:4.89), Bacillus thuringiensis 0.5% WP (1:4.75), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (1:4.43) as compared to control plot (1:2.96).

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 89%

Efficacy of Certain Insecticides and Biopesticides against Dimondback Moth Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) on Cabbage, Brassica oleracea (Linnaeus)

Vaishnavi

Tayde

2022

IJPSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Highest yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC (325 q/ha) (1:6.37) is similar to the findings of Sharma et al, [8], Spinosad 45% SC (310 q/ha) (1:5.75) is similar to the findings of Gill et al, [9] and Gaddam et al, [10], Indoxacarb 14.5% SC (300 q/ha) (1:6.33) is similar to the findings of Harika et al, [11] and Gaddam et al, [10], Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (295 q/ha) (1:6.25) is similar to the findings of Akbar et al, [12], Bacillus thuringeinsis (1x10 8 CFU/ml) (280 q/ha ) (1:5.97) is similar to the findings of Choyon et al, [13] and Beauvaria bassiana (1x10 8 CFU/ml) (270q/ha) (1:5.72) is similar to the findings of Debbarma et al, [14] The treatments Metarhizium anisiopliae (1x10 8 CFU/ml) (260 q/ha) (1:5.50) is similar to the findings of Singh et al, [15], and the lowest yield was recorded in control (150 q/ha) (1:3.34) (Table 1).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 89%

Comparative Efficacy and Economics of Chemicals Insecticides and Bioagents against Diamondback Moth (Plutella xylostella) on Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. Capitata L.)

Khan

Tayde²

2022

IJPSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Field trial was conducted during rabi season 2021-2022 at Central Research Farm (CRF), SHUATS. The experiment was laid out in Randomised Block Design with eight treatments each replicated thrice using a variety Green Soccer (546). The treatments are were Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC -T1, Indoxacarb 14.5%SC-T2, Emamectin benzoate 5% SG-T3, Spinosad 45% SC-T4, Beaveria bassaina (1x108CFU/ml)-T5, Metarhizium anisopilae (1x108 CFU/ml)-T6, Bacillus thuringiensis (1x108CFU/ml)-T7 and untreated control -T8. Mean reduction in the larval population per plant revealed that all the treatments were significantly superior over the control (6.51). Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC recorded lowest mean larval population of P xylostella (1.52), followed by Spinosad 45% SC (1.75),Indoxacarb 14.SC (2.00), Emamectin Benzoate 5% SG (2.28), B thuringiensis (2.68), B bassiana (2.87), M anisopilae (3.02). Highest yield (280 q/ha) as well as B:C ratio (1:6.37) was obtained from the treatment Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC followed by Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:6.33), Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (1:6.25), B thuringiensis (1:5.97), Spinosad 45% SC (1:5.75), B bassiana (1:5.72), M anisopilae (1:5.50) as compared to control (1:3.34).

show abstract

“…Nowadays, this insect pest resisted major insecticides viz, BHC and DDT (Dara 2020). Numerous recent pesticides were suggested to manage Plutella xylostella L. but the observation showed that 60% of the farmers cannot control this pest effectively (Harika et al, 2019). In the 1980s, there have several new pesticides were produced to reduce P. xylostella viz, triazophos, permethrin, fenvalerate, cartop, and methomyl.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As the elimination of chemical pesticides is unviable in the farmers, it has required the use of substitute eco-friendly insecticides for maintainable controlling of diamondback moth which can reduce it to minor pest status by the natural enemies and eco-friendly materials. The change of resistance against these outdated insecticides may be simply degraded by the new group of sustainable compounds to protect the environment (Harika et al, 2019). Keeping because of the seriousness of this pest and the economic importance of the cabbage crop, the current research was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the best-known insecticides viz., abamectin, spinosad, cypermethrin, and endosulfan under field conditions of a semi-arid zone at El-Kattawia, Abu-Hammad City, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt against Plutella xylostella on cabbage.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of Abamectin as An Eco-Friendly Pesticide Against Diamondback Moth on Cabbage Crop

Morsy

Elwan

2021

Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, is the greatest damaging insect of cabbage plants. Two field experiments were conducted at private farm in El-Kattawia area, Abu-Hammad City, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt to assess the effectiveness of abamectin 1.8 EC against cabbage diamondback moth. Two field experiments were performed at the same farm in different seasons (2019 and 2020).The experiments were conducted in a randomized block design with a plot size of 4 x 5 m with three replications. The concerned treatments were enjoined four times at 14 days intervals beginning from the 30 th day after cultivation. The pneumatic Knapsack sprayer was used to spray fluid (600 liters per hectare). Observations on larval population were made before spraying and on 3, 7, 10, and 14 days after spraying from 10 randomly tagged plants in each plot. Four doses of abamectin @ 9, 11,13, and 15 g a.i.ha -1 were assessed against the Plutella xylostella under study. Besides, Cypermethrin 10 EC @ 70 g a.i./ha , endosulfan 35 EC @ 420 g a.i./ha, spinosad 45 SC @ 75 g a.i./ha, and an untreated blank were also included in the field experiment.The findings concluded that treating with abamectin at 15 g a.i./ ha was the highest mean reduction which meaningfully blocked the population of diamondback moth larvae and recorded a mean reduction of 72.5, 70.7, 75.2, and 78.0 percent from untreated check after first, second, third and fourth sprays, respectively. While the results obtained from abamectin at 11 g a.i./ ha were on par with standard check spinosad at 75 g a.i./ha and excelled over cypermethrin and endosulfan. A similar trend was also observed in the second experiment. The yield of cabbage heads also increased significantly at all the doses tested in the two experiments under field conditions as compared to the control plot. The study demonstrates the potentiality of abamectin 1.8 EC as an eco-friendly bioinsecticide against the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). The doses of the studied abamectin @ 15, 13, and 11 g a.i.ha -1 were found to be highly effective to control the infestation of diamondback moth in the cabbage plants under the conditions of a semi-arid zone in Egypt.

show abstract

Evaluation of Certain Insecticides against Diamondback Moth (DBM) Plutella xylostella on Cauliflower

Cited by 6 publications

References 6 publications

Efficacy of Certain Insecticides and Biopesticides against Dimondback Moth Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) on Cabbage, Brassica oleracea (Linnaeus)

Efficacy of Certain Insecticides and Biopesticides against Dimondback Moth Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) on Cabbage, Brassica oleracea (Linnaeus)

Comparative Efficacy and Economics of Chemicals Insecticides and Bioagents against Diamondback Moth (Plutella xylostella) on Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. Capitata L.)

Use of Abamectin as An Eco-Friendly Pesticide Against Diamondback Moth on Cabbage Crop

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About