2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-018-2046-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Chlorella sorokiniana isolated from local municipal wastewater for dual application in nutrient removal and biodiesel production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although NEIST BT-2 yielded a high biomass, only a moderate amount of total lipid, i.e., 19.17% of dry cell weight was accumulated by it. Low lipid content of 4.65% and 19.47% w/w in Chlorella sorokiniana was also reported by Sinha et al (2016) and Eladel et al (2018), respectively. The highest amount of total, as well as neutral lipid (31.56% and, 260.29 a.u., respectively), was accumulated by NEIST BT-A6.…”
Section: Number Of Dayssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Although NEIST BT-2 yielded a high biomass, only a moderate amount of total lipid, i.e., 19.17% of dry cell weight was accumulated by it. Low lipid content of 4.65% and 19.47% w/w in Chlorella sorokiniana was also reported by Sinha et al (2016) and Eladel et al (2018), respectively. The highest amount of total, as well as neutral lipid (31.56% and, 260.29 a.u., respectively), was accumulated by NEIST BT-A6.…”
Section: Number Of Dayssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the current study, ammonium, nitrate and phosphate concentrations in unsterilized and undiluted wastewater were reduced by 100, 96 and 69%, respectively, after 22 days of C. sorokiniana growth. Previous studies on C. sorokiniana show similar results, with nutrient removal efficiencies of 74-84% after 10 days of growth in municipal wastewater (Eladel et al, 2019), and 92-97% removal after 24 days of growth in 50% diluted swine wastewater (Chen et al, 2020). In addition, this approach adds value to the water treatment process by the production of commercially valuable microalgal feedstock.…”
Section: Wastewater-derived Algal Biomass As Feedstock For Animal Feedsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Several studies were conducted in the fields of isolated of native microalgal species even from Mediterranean Sea (Abdel Rahman et al, 2010;Ashour et al, 2019), lakes (Aly and Gad, 2010;Selim et al, 2014;Marrez et al, 2014Abomohra et al, 2017Abdel-Razek et al, 2019), freshwater habitats (Mahmoud et al, 2015;Mohamed et al, 2017;, wastewater (Rakaiby et al, 2012;Mahmoud et al, 2016;Eladel et al, 2019;) or soil (El-Sheekh et al, 2017;2018). Moreover, several ecological studies were conducted to screening and identify the communities of microalgal species reported in Egyptian different water bodies like Mediterranean Sea (Fatma et al, 1995;Khairy et al, 2015), Red Sea and lakes (Ali and Khiray, 2012;Khiray et al, 2015).…”
Section: Keys Of Microalgae Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%