2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of clinical benefits achievable by using different optimization algorithms during real-time prostate brachytherapy

Abstract: Application of the blind inverse optimization (BIO) algorithm led to clinically best dose parameters for PTV and the rectum. Use of geometrical optimization (GO) led to smaller doses in the urethra, which was however associated with a certain dose decrease also in PTV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of treatment fractions was 10 for palliative cases and ranging between 20 and 39 for radical cases at the LRCP, while all patients at the GPCC had 25 fractions of external beam radiotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost. [31][32][33] The database included the following information for each patient: (i) the number of treatment fractions; (ii) daily correction shifts in the x, y, and z directions and their manual correction components; (iii) treatment position (supine or prone); (iv) the target for irradiation (prostate or prostate bed), and (v) MVCT imaging mode (normal or coarse).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of treatment fractions was 10 for palliative cases and ranging between 20 and 39 for radical cases at the LRCP, while all patients at the GPCC had 25 fractions of external beam radiotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost. [31][32][33] The database included the following information for each patient: (i) the number of treatment fractions; (ii) daily correction shifts in the x, y, and z directions and their manual correction components; (iii) treatment position (supine or prone); (iv) the target for irradiation (prostate or prostate bed), and (v) MVCT imaging mode (normal or coarse).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jednak jedną z dobrze znanych wad algorytmów obliczeniowych jest to, że takie obliczenia dawki opierają się na jednej pozycji źródłowej w jednorodnym środowisku wodnym [4,5]. Całkowity rozkład dawki w ośrodku jest produktem sumy rozkładu dawki pochodzącej od każdej pozycji źródła, które są obliczane przez algorytm optymalizacyjny [6,7].…”
Section: Nowe Algorytmy Do Obliczania Rozkładów Dawek W Brachyterapiiunclassified
“…The TPS used in most of the cases are still based on the TG-43 recommendations, which have been verified in homogenous conditions [ 4 ]. However, one of the well-known defects of the calculation algorithms based on the Sivert integral and modular dose calculation models is that such dose rate calculations are based on a single source position in a homogenous water environment [ 5 , 6 , 7 ], whereas the overall dose distribution in the medium is a product of the contribution from each source position and the modulated step time, which are governed by optimization routines [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%