2023
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2023-2370
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of CMIP6 model simulations of PM2.5 and its components over China

Fangxuan Ren,
Jintai Lin,
Chenghao Xu
et al.

Abstract: Abstract. Earth system models (ESMs) participating in the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) simulate various components of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) as major climate forcers. Yet the model performance for PM2.5 components remains little evaluated due in part to lack of observational data. Here, we evaluate near-surface concentrations of PM2.5 and its five main components over China as simulated by fourteen CMIP6 models, including organic carbon (OC, available in 14 models), bla… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, the coarser resolution in the global model (0.9 × 1.25) is frequently found to be unable to realistically represent the complex physical and chemical processes of regionalscale air pollution, especially for O 3 (Yue et al, 2023). Moreover, missing chemical mechanisms in the model, such as the lack of representations of nitrate and ammonium (Ren et al, 2023) and the secondary organic aerosol (Liu et al, 2021), prevents the model from accurately simulating PM 2.5 concentration, especially during heavily polluted regions, such as China and India (Turnock et al, 2020). Another major uncertainty originates from the inaccurate emission inventory, especially for developing regions in early periods, as reported by the global datasets (Paulot et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First of all, the coarser resolution in the global model (0.9 × 1.25) is frequently found to be unable to realistically represent the complex physical and chemical processes of regionalscale air pollution, especially for O 3 (Yue et al, 2023). Moreover, missing chemical mechanisms in the model, such as the lack of representations of nitrate and ammonium (Ren et al, 2023) and the secondary organic aerosol (Liu et al, 2021), prevents the model from accurately simulating PM 2.5 concentration, especially during heavily polluted regions, such as China and India (Turnock et al, 2020). Another major uncertainty originates from the inaccurate emission inventory, especially for developing regions in early periods, as reported by the global datasets (Paulot et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5). The underestimation of the surface PM 2.5 was partly caused by the missing model representation of nitrate and ammonium (Ren et al, 2023) and the secondary organic aerosol (Liu et al, 2021). We first assessed the interannual variation of ANTHRO and BB emissions of CO, NOx, NMVOC, sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), ammonia (NH 3 ), black carbon (BC), and organic carbon (OC) in India between 1995 and 2014 from the CEDS.…”
Section: Cam-chem Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%